Showing posts with label planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label planning. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Gentrification Panel Discussion - TONIGHT

Mikaela says:
Sorry for the late notice! I just got the email myself... Wish I could go, but I made prior plans. I wanted to post it just in case someone out there would similarly hate to miss this...

If anyone goes, say hello to Claudia for me (and all m-pyre girls), would you, please???

At some point, I'd love to have a discussion about the whole White History Week thing, but that's for another day (send in your thoughts!)...

Wed., Jan. 9th at 7 pm
Gentrification: Deconstructing Entitlement - Whose Place, Whose Economy?
panel discussion staring: Claudia Isaac; Ricky Lee Allen; Aztatl; and Dr. Nword of Out ch'YondA
Is whiteness a form of property? What do you think?
Bring your comments and questions.
Part of our ongoing White History Week Jan. 4 - 13th
The full schedule is available at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~mimileland/
Out ch'Yonda
929 SW 4th
9 blocks south of Central and 5 blocks north of Cesar Chavez
in lovely ungentrified Barelas

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Politics, Money, & Growing through Houses

marjorie says...

Regarding the increasingly serious mortgage crisis our nation faces comes this pretty straightforward, and on it's face pretty simple, analysis:

"We have the fundamental problem that we built too many houses and we charged too high a price for them," says David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York. "We have to stop building houses for a while and the prices have to come down. We are trying to make sure that process doesn't derail the rest of the economy."

We live in an economy that measures it's success through "growth", which is largely measured through such indicators as the unemployment rate, job growth, and something called "housing starts." In the debate raging right now over Tax Increment Development Districts (TIDDs), those of us who think it's a bad idea to hand over large tax revenue streams to developers are labeled "anti-growth." But, frankly, I don't know how anyone with a modicum of sense could be "anti-growth" given the economic collapse that would surely follow if we stopped creating jobs. We live in a capitalist economy, after all, and the health of our community relies majorly on the existence of jobs. This of course is the reason tax subsidies are given to large corporations, and why we have other government sponsored initiatives and programs to help smaller companies succeed. In reality, having no government intervention in our capitalist economy would lead to a world of unsupportable dichotomies: beggars and kings, masters and slaves. You can catch a glimpse of what that world looks like in both the history books and the current affairs of this country--check out American slavery, the period of the industrial revolution, or the unprotected wage labor in our agricultural sector right up to today.

Obviously I'm not against public intervention in the economy. But, whenever it involves the use of public money to incentivize job creation there are serious issues that arise around accountability and transparency. These are big words that essentially are about not allowing a small group of people to enrich themselves at the public's expense. The question of how politics and profit intersect is a huge one, and not just in Albuquerque. This is the essential problem behind our push as a nation to find a way to eliminate private money from electoral campaigns. Then there's the revolving employment door...go out one side and you're a lobbying hack for big business, go out the other and you get to run campaigns or develop goverment policy. Get bored? Just step back in the doorway and come out on the flip side. We see it at the national level, and we most certainly see it in New Mexico. In fact we've seen it up close and personal when it comes to TIDDs in just the past couple of weeks. Is Marty Chavez in the pocket of developers? Is Mark Fleisher all about the money? Who knows, really? I don't know them. But that $5000 from SunCal is a lot of money. And Fleisher certainly likes that revolving door doesn't he? And what about Tim Cummins? There he is standing to profit enormously from the SunCal development, and he has no qualms about using his County Commission seat to push forward a massive tax subsidy to make it happen. Is there anything unique about any of this? I don't think so. This is a huge problem for us as a society, and I have to say...it bugs me even more than the fact that we're balkanizing our tax base for the next couple of generations to bolster the bottom line of SunCal and Mesa del Sol.

On that point, despite what Cummins says, it isn't misinformation or lies when we point out that these TIDDs are, in fact, bolstering these companies' bottom lines. Our tax revenues are going to pay for infrastructure that these corporations are building. We're paying them directly, through a complicated shell game. And on top of that infrastructure will be built their profit making ventures: houses. And the houses will be sold at whatever price the market will bear. The city and county will use all those new houses to declare that Albuquerque is a "growth city"...a vibrant and thriving economy. But within the simplicity of those indicators lies a lot of consequences, some unintended, some completely obscured but with long-range impacts. These include in the case of TIDDs the negative impact on the State's general fund, not to mention the hit locally. But beyond this, there are all kinds of social and environmental issues with growth for the sake of growth measured in houses and their attendant highways.

Right now we're facing a real national economic crisis that derives from the unchecked housing starts growth machine. And if my memory serves me correctly, many of the same people who sounded a warning bell about the out-of-control housing market are the same people today who are labeled "anti-growth" in the face of Albuquerque's launch headfirst into incentivizing massive housing development on our west side. Rhetoric is fun. But frankly, it would be much wiser to instead take the blinders off and reconsider how growth is defined in the first place. Not to mention, we need to continue our efforts to take the money out of politics.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Form-Based Code and Other Planning Ponderings

Mikaela says:
If you haven't been following the under-the-radar "debate" about adding Form-Based Code to the City's bag of planning tricks, you can read a great summary of the public information meeting December 8 by Ben Roberts, with whom, it turns out, I think I shared an English Lit class way back ago. (Such. A. Small. Town.)

Unfortunately, I couldn't go to the meeting because the County scheduled the summary session of the design charrette for the Ditches-with-Trails prototype for the same day.

Here are a few off-the-cuff reactions to the proposed Form-Based Code thing:

  • Ben's main question, of who's pushing for this and why (who pays? who benefits?) is still unanswered.
  • In general, the Form-Based Code movement is brought to you by the same folks that brought you picket-fence communities, as though the only thing developers want to build anymore is sea-side condos connected by sidewalks to a public square with a post office. All the hubbub about giving more freedom for different neighborhoods to look different is a bunch of hooha. They'll try to make one design code fit all, you just wait. And it won't be one that fits most. The folks who seem to be advocating this thing are for higher-density, mixed-use development, which is great for some, not great for others. In some sense, Euclidean Zoning provides more flexibility, because it doesn't tell you how to design, it just says you can't house one use near a use that conflicts with another. Is there an opportunity to relax those strict lines between uses for C-1 and O-1? Sure. But let's talk about that, versus throwing out the baby, the bathwater, and the regulations protecting them both!
  • Which brings me to my biggest question about how to protect nearby residents from uses that could fit themselves into a generic design-code place but that shouldn't really be there. There are many uses that can be adapted to have minimal daily impact on their neighbors that still pose safety risks if all hell breaks loose. If the Form-Based Code erases the public notice process, or constricts the public process to talk through what risks uses pose and how each company is addressing them to the satisfaction of the City and their neighbors, I think we lose a powerful opportunity for oversight and safety. The developers of a Solid Waste Transfer Station may believe they pose absolutely no risk and have no impact on their neighbors, whereas the neighbors might disagree and like some discussion of what's safe, what level of impact is really acceptable, etc. Same for most businesses and the ratio of acceptable traffic impact, for example. While standard Euclidean Zoning is not the best or most flexible solution for many things, it's basic intention to protect the public safety and welfare is vital, and in my mind, Form-Based Code not only doesn't do better -- it eliminates protection. What do you want ultimate control over? How the building next to you looks, or whether it contains a business that poses a safety hazard for your family? I mean, really.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Must-read ABQ items of the day

Maggie says:
First, via m-pyre fave Gene Grant, a slice of Albuquerque's lack of accountability and planning power:

Albuquerque Tribune: BMX neighbors didn't sign up for monstrosity


More to come on this one.

And second, local father, husband, and grad student Adil Osman was finally freed yesterday after spending ten months in federal custody for an immigration dispute. Is an apology enough?

Monday, April 02, 2007

Question: What does the future hold for Urban Design in the Q?

Mikaela says:
Answer: Lots of debate!

Fresh off a morning meeting with fellow Planners Network folks, in which we talked about planning a panel discussion on community design, I'm greeted with this announcement for TONIGHT.

It will be more general, and it will be more ... um ... developer friendly, but someone should go and check it out (and report back).

Working stiffs, note the starting time is 4 pm.

"URBAN DESIGN FUTURES IN ALBUQUERQUE, a panel discussion"
Monday, April 2, 2007
4:00-6:00 PM
Santa Ana Room, Student Union Building (SUB), Upper Floor
Please note time and venue changes


The School of Architecture and Planning at the University of New Mexico will sponsor a panel and open discussion on urban design in Albuquerque in the 21st Century. This panel discussion is the final event of the John Gaw Meem Lecture Series for this semester.

The Panel members will include people with a variety of viewpoints including architects, landscape architects, planners, politicians, developers, students and others:

  • Miguel Gandert, Moderator, Professor Communications + Journalism, Photographer
  • Ike Benton, architect, City Councilor
  • Chris Calott, architect
  • Connie Chavez, president, Sawmill Trust
  • Dierdre Firth, planner, City of Albuquerque
  • Will Gleason, planner, Dekker Parich Sabatini
  • John Lewinger, developer
  • Paul Lusk, architect + planner
  • George Radnovich, landscape Architect, Principal, Sites Southwest
  • Noreen Richards, recently graduated student in Architecture
  • David Salamon, Architecture student

After a very short statement from each panel member the audience will be invited to engage in a lively discussion and debate.

Please note this event was originally scheduled to take place at Northrop Hall at 5:30. For further information please contact Dot Waldrip at 277-5885.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

TONIGHT: Women and Planning

Maggie says:
An organization near and dear to M3's hearts, the Albuquerque Planners Network is presenting a forum tonight that's sure to generate community, conversation, and connection. Planning always involves community, conversation, and connection... but when women are the focus, it's bound to be especially captivating. This event should be a great one, so we hope to see many of you there!

Women and Planning
Panelists from different sectors of the planning profession will discuss
the role of gender in planning.


Thursday, March 22
6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.
Sawmill Lofts Multipurpose Room, 1801 Bellamah NW

Panel
Connie Chavez, Sawmill Community Land Trust
Paula Garcia, New Mexico Acequia Association
Bernadette Miera, Bernalillo County
Nichole Sanchez-Howell, Village of Corrales
Renee Villareal, Santa Fe County

Moderator
Claudia Isaac, UNM School of Architecture and Planning (and m-pyre hero)

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Reminder: TONIGHT! Women in Action @ the NHCC

Mikaela reminds:
TODAY,March 6 at 6 pm, the NHCC is hosting Women in Action, a panel discussion of local women activists, artists, and entrepreneurs, also as part of Women & Creativity. This one's near and dear to my little political heart. The panel includes:

  • Dory Wegryzn, who was instrumental in forming the Sawmill Community Land Trust,
  • Sandra Montes, who's fought tirelessly for the rights of Pajarito Mesa residents in Albuquerque's South Valley,
  • Joann Bejar, who's done everything from being a filmaker, labor organizer, to mom,
  • Naomi Natale, who created the Cradle Project -- an art project that calls attention to and raises funds for children orphaned by disease and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa,
  • Myra Murphy-Jacob of Sustainable Global Leadership Alliance, which trains and sends leaders to other countries, where they help train others as leaders in sustainable, eco- and community-friendly business practices, and
  • Margo Ganster of Green It!, a local company that helps other companies to incorporate ways to be "green," adding to the sustainability of our economy & our environment

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

m stands for "moving"

Mikaela says:
I personally love it when life is moving too fast to get caught up in the immobility of rage at current events. There's plenty I'm fuming about (Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, New Orleans, Libby trial, executive orders, creeping fascism of the Bush administration that seems to go all-but unnoticed by the general public... whew, better stop there!), but for a little while, I've got too much on my plate here in the Q to worry myself into inaction about the rest of the world.

It's all about doing what you can where you can, right?

So this evening (starting around 7 pm), I'm taking part in an event for women: Firestorm, at the Winning Coffee Co. on Harvard & Central (m-pyre readers know all about how much we love Winning!), hosted by Maresa Thompson, organizer of the fabulous National Poetry Slam in 2005. I'm even going to read a poem during the open mic! Then, with my bestest m-friends, we'll cheer and support our fellow creative women, strong women w/ strong voices telling us all what we need to hear, even when we sometimes don't want to listen. Tonight's all about listening!

Thursday, if I didn't have a conflict, I'd be going to see "When the Levees Broke," Spike Lee's documentary on the Katrina disaster in New Orleans, being shown by the Albuquerque chapter of Planners Network, made up of UNM Community & Regional Planning students & community members, at Out Ch-Yonda in Barelas (4th & Santa Fe). 6 pm.

On Saturday, I'll be going to hear local poets read at the Main Library downtown. How cool is it that our urban library is opening its doors to a largely urban movement of spoken-word poetry. Totally cool. That's from 3-5 pm. Afterward, I'll join Lisa Gill @ 7 pm for a reading celebrating her 2007 National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship in UNM's Student Union Building (SUB) Acoma Room. Who else wins an award and throws a party for her community? Lisa rocks.

Friday, March 2, the NHCC, Harwood, ABQ Slams, & IPI are putting on Women Centerstage as part of the NHCC's Women & Creativity festival. We've gathered some of the coolest women poets around -- Lisa Gill, Esther Griego, Valerie Martinez, Demetria Martinez -- and paired them with Rah Goddess, who some of you may have heard and been electrified by on NPR's Bioneers show this summer. She's a hip-hop feminist poet and performance artist who coined the term "floetry" and spawned a whole generation of empowered and empowering women performers. Show starts at 7. Afterward, an all-women slam will choose the winner to represent Albuquerque at the World of Women (WoW) national poetry slam in Chicago this October. A hot night to be sure. Not to be missed.



Tuesday, March 6, 6 pm, the NHCC is hosting Women in Action, a panel discussion of local women activists, artists, and entrepreneurs, also as part of Women & Creativity. This one's near and dear to my little political heart. The panel includes:

  • Dory Wegryzn, who was instrumental in forming the Sawmill Community Land Trust,
  • Sandra Montes, who's fought tirelessly for the rights of Pajarito Mesa residents in Albuquerque's South Valley,
  • Joann Bejar, who's done everything from being a filmaker, labor organizer, to mom,
  • Naomi Natale, who created the Cradle Project -- an art project that calls attention to and raises funds for children orphaned by disease and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa,
  • Myra Murphy-Jacob of Sustainable Global Leadership Alliance, which trains and sends leaders to other countries, where they help train others as leaders in sustainable, eco- and community-friendly business practices, and
  • Margo Ganster of Green It!, a local company that helps other companies to incorporate ways to be "green," adding to the sustainability of our economy & our environment

In between all that, I'll be finishing an anthology of Voces students work for UNM Press and putting together an anthology of ABQ Slam poets w/ fellow IPI members Danny Solis, Susan McAllister, and Don McIver.

Oh, and planning a wedding.

Busy? Me? No.....

Lord help me the day I slow down long enough to really soak in the news from around the world. It's not looking good, but I'm trying to do what I can to support good things in my community. In the seconds between whirling from event to event, I wish peace for us all.

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Weekend reading

Maggie says:
I find myself fairly uninterested in the Superbowl this weekend (despite the compelling coaching storyline), and am instead puttering around in typical un-American fashion. Such puttering affords me lots of time to read, go shoe-shopping, have the strongest margaritas on the planet with Marjorie's fam, and go hiking. So before I meet Mikaela to head over to the foothills, here's what's peaking my interest word-wise this weekend:

  • More than good food and friendliness. Facing South, a fantastic blog produced by one of my fave organizations, compiled a list of its top-five books on Southern populist history. I have a couple of these, and the comments remind me that I'm still hanging on to a Loomis loaner that I need to return. This list is a great place to start diving into the rich promise that those who love the South know it very much holds. After you're primed with good 'ol Southern history, give this important Nation cover story a try before you start trash-talking about how we'll be safe ignoring the South in '08. Who knows... it just might influence your pick for the party.
  • Biden: not just inarticulate. Joe Biden's recent gaffe is, as this Times article points out, not a gaffe at all, but the latest proof that most Americans are still surprised when non-whites sound smart. The word of attack here is "articulate," and with good insight this article points out the so-called compliments we're compelled to offer up for non-whites who sound... white. '"Al Sharpton is incredibly articulate,” said Tricia Rose, professor of Africana Studies at Brown University. “But because he speaks with a cadence and style that is firmly rooted in black rhetorical tradition you will rarely hear white people refer to him as articulate.”'
  • Off to La-La Land. I'm heading to Los Angeles next week for a conference, and nothing has been amusing me in advance of the trip more than Curbed LA, a deliciously acerbic blog on planning and real estate in LA. More East Coast-oriented readers might enjoy the original NYC-based Curbed a little more. Same snarky real estate banter, only denser. Where else can I be pointed to the coolest Google image search result ever (for "urban planner") and news like this: "In order to make sure that Chinatown is catching up to the rest of downtown yuppie invasion, the City Council fast-tracked the approval of a new mixed-use development at 900 N. Broadway." Hee hee hee... Oh and!, see the sister blogs of Curbed for foodie talk: Eater and Eater LA. How much would I love to see a Curbed ABQ one day... Any takers?
  • Local poets at it again. Yesterday I was lucky enough to get a preview of The Wellesley Poems, the forthcoming tome from local poet Adam Rubinstein. Adam's lastest poems are ruminations on growing up in the suburbs, the dangers of inventing - or ignoring - collective identity, and what "home" really means. Not to get ahead of myself, but I think this work is going to be my favorite of anything he's ever done. So while Adam's finishing this fantastic collection, go and peruse his other stuff to satiate your need for good words.
  • Still loving 'Little Children'. I can't tell you how much I loved this movie, far and away my favorite of the year. I'll be cheering heartily for it to win Best Adapted Screenplay at the Oscars. Kate Winslet is her typical brilliantly glorious self, Jackie Earle Haley is a revelation, and the writing is the best I've seen on film in forever. I wish the downtown theater would bring it back in time for the Oscars, but this is ABQ, so I'm not holding my breath. In the meantime, Google "Little Children" for a wealth of goodies, including interviews (don't miss anything featuring director Todd Fields), long think pieces on suburbia and infidelity, and more. Yum yum yum.

Monday, January 29, 2007

And now for a public service announcement...

Mikaela advocates:
Let me start by saying I can't go to this meeting because I'll be leading another community meeting. Otherwise, I'd drag myself, even though it doesn't sound like fun. It is, however, incredibly important.

How many times have you complained about traffic? About the lack of planning in this town? About growth? More than once, I'm guessing, based on who we are and who reads our little blog.

So buck up. Finally you can do something about it -- or at least complain to the right people in a forum where you can be assured they're really listening.

What: Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Forum
When: TOMORROW, Tuesday, January 30th, 7-9 pm
Where: First Unitarian Church (3701 Carlisle NE)
Who: 1000 Friends and ABQ Alliance for Active Living


What you can expect to hear:
  • Recommendation for a Walkable Neighborhoods Program
  • Expert & pedestrian/bicycle advocate Mark Fenton's take on the health benefits of a good MTP
  • Next steps & how to stay involved!
Other Big Shots on the Response Panel:
  • City Councilor Debbie O'Malley
  • BernCo Rep.
  • Mid-Region Council of Governments (MRCOG) Rep.
  • Claude Morelli, Walk ABQ
  • Gabriel Nims, 1000 Friends

Why go? Because this, like the U.S. Census, is the kind of seminal government action that shapes our lives in ways we almost can't perceive because it's all-pervasive.

We want to complain about government and about planning, but too often we're not willing to do the simplest little thing that can have a huge impact -- GO TO A MEETING, SIT AND LISTEN, PERHAPS RAISE YOUR HAND TO ASK A QUESTION OR SHARE AN OPINION. That's it. That's all that's required.

Pretend you're from Athens and feel really good that you're performing one of the oldest civic duties in this our long tradition of democracy. So much better than voting, I promise!

Whoever sucks it up and attends, could you let me know? And if I hear any feedback from the meeting, I promise to share it with you. Dammit, That's America! (Can you hear the patriotic music swell as we zoom in on our waving flag? Yeah, me too.)

Need a map? Click here

Suggested Donation: $5

Monday, January 08, 2007

New Orleans Violence is a Post-Katrina Endemic Problem

marjorie says...

Many of you may have read the news lately about the rash of murders in New Orleans. It has become so bad that city leaders have proposed a curfew.

Reflecting back on the Katrina catastrophe, I remember the incredible outrage and upset so many of us felt. That disaster reflected back to all of us in horrific clarity the incredible problems we have in our society dealing with structural poverty. I call it structural because that is what it is: a condition present due to the economic and political structure that orders our society. A capitalist economy demands that poor people exist. And our political system mitigates this reality enough through social programs to allow for the survival of capitalism. I believe one of the reasons so many people don't want to confront the problem of racism is that to do so clearly shows this structural problem with capitalism, because there is a clear correlation between poverty (class) and race. To truly change that requires fundamental change. Hard fundamental change.

During the Katrina weeks, there was an enormous outpouring of grief, rage, confusion, not to mention charity and support to those in need, from across the United States. And when the crisis lessened there were a lot of calls to not forget and to not abandon the poor people of New Orleans to an uncertain future, who were overwhelmingly African American. But, really, that is what happened. The media dropped it. And the planners, developers, and political bureaucrats have swooped in to change the face of the city. Some of that might be good, but plenty of it is resulting in displacement. Violence is endemic because the plight of the poor in that city has remained, their already tenuous hold on stability incredibly strained by an unresponsive monolithic government and a profit driven land development system.

The violence is so bad that it is now spilling over into the lives of those who are normally more insulated from it...that may be one reason we are all finally hearing about it. I'd like to share an email I received from a friend and co-worker, Rosina Roibal, who lived in New Orleans for five years. In her email, Rosina talks about her friend who was shot and killed last week...mentioned in this newspaper article. I hope it will personalize this issue for more m-pyre readers, and I hope that we all can take some time to communicate with our congresspeople about this issue...because its an issue that belongs to all of us. There are other ways to help as well...for one, doing fundraisers in your homes to send money to community organizing groups working on the ground in New Orleans.

But in the bigger scheme of things, we all need to really examine how our system works. The plight in New Orleans is extraordinary in some ways, but there are struggling people throughout this country, many of them homeless. That isn't because they're lazy or don't want to help themselves. Its because they live in an economic system that requires them to exist. The only solution is a social response, which means us.


Dear Friends/family,

If you don't know, I went to college in New Orleans, lived there for 5 years.

I feel that you should know what New Orleans is like, and the devastation that has resulted due to the government’s lack of action to help it. Yesterday, my friend Teresa (who lives there now) called me to say that our friend Paul and Helen were shot in their home, and Helen died. There were 6 shootings in the same day around New Orleans. Paul was the leader of our band the “Troublemakers.” They have both been extremely active in making New Orleans a better place for poor people, like Food not Bombs (bringing free food to the community), a medical clinic for poor people, animal rights work. They were anarchist, atheist, and vegan with a 2 year old daughter and a pet pig named Rosie. If you had a chance to meet them, they were the happiest most energetic fun people I’ve ever met. Helen made films. There is a protest tomorrow to end the violence.

Just one week before, I was in New Orleans staying with my friends Ben, Teresa, and Chester. One day we heard 8 gun shots two doors down. A 17 year old boy was shot and died. His aunt was shot in the head 3 weeks before. They were into crack.

There is a film by Spike Lee, called “When the Levees Broke.” You should see it when it comes out on dvd, it was on HBO, and is great. However, most people don’t realize the long lasting problems that the people of New Orleans are facing. I don’t know if people like you and me can help change things in New Orleans. Poor people in New Orleans don’t have homes, they are not being given rights, they are not allowed to move back into their past homes, which are now being turned into condominiums for the rich. They’ve lost their families and friends and jobs and belongings. They’re depressed. They get into drugs to help the pain. Crack is all they can afford. Then they crack. They shoot someone for just a little money, for something to eat or just to buy some more crack. My friends living there say it’s so bad, they have to leave, even the ones who’ve lived there their entire lives. Teachers are stuck with huge class sizes, no supplies. The poverty and violence is overwhelming. We could go on and on about the horrible conditions and issues in New Orleans, but the bottom line is that our government doesn’t care about the poor people of New Orleans or the poor people of our country or the world for that matter.

George, how many more of my friends have to be shot? How many more people in New Orleans have to live without homes or help? How many more times will you allow levees to break? How many more thousands of people and animals will you leave stuck in a disaster? George, I don’t trust you, and I hate you and your posse.

I don't know what to do and feel scared and helpless. New Orleans was already behind in terms of social justice and being progressive. I give my friends in New Orleans all of my power and know you will fight till the death.


Rosina Roibal

Friday, December 01, 2006

When Homeowners Associations Go Too Far

Mikaela sighs:
Ah, vindication is sweet. Finally! Another good sign that all is not lost in America.

Happy Holidays, everyone. Peace to all.

From Democracy Now:

A Colorado couple has won their battle to keep a holiday wreath shaped like a peace sign on the front of their house. Last week, Lisa Jensen and Bill Trimarco received a letter from the board of their homeowners association threatening them with fines of $25 a day unless they removed the peace wreath from their house.


The couple refused and as word spread, others in their town put up peace wreaths in solidarity. Earlier this week, there was a march of people carrying peace signs through the center of town. And a peace wreath has been placed on a bell tower in the middle of the town square. The town website also posted a message saying that it wholly supported the Jensen/Trimarco wreath and "also wishes for peace on Earth."


The three-member board has withdrawn their demand, issued an apology to the couple and resigned from the association.

Monday, November 06, 2006

TONIGHT: City Council meeting!

Maggie says:
I'm hoping to see lots of you fellow planning nerds out at the City Council meeting tonight. There are not one but two important items on the agenda:

  • Extending the City infrastructure tax to fund Albuquerque's Modern Streetcar project
  • Passing a moratorium on ugly big boxes until appropriate design regulations can be established (I already wrote about it here)
My laptop hates the Council Chambers wireless network, so instead of blogging I'll probably be finishing up my ultra-nerdy congressional spreadsheets for tomorrow night. I can't wait for Wednesday morning... if only so I can BREATHE again. (Insert half-capacity sigh here...)

YOUR FRIENDLY MIDNIGHT UPDATE: If anyone's keeping score, the streetcar passed and the big box moratorium was rescheduled for the beginning of the next Council meeting.

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Thanks, Debbie

Maggie says:
Once again, I've just gotta say it:


That's my councilor!!!

Councilor Debbie O'Malley is proposing a series of site design standards for new big box development in Albuquerque. As the Journal article explains, the proposal would set standards for street connectivity, pedestrian access, size restrictions, more humane parking lots, landscaping, facades, outdoor storage, and more.

This proposal is loooooong overdue, as anyone driving around 95% of Albuquerque can attest. What's so frustrating about planning in the city and county is that we have tiny pockets where good planning and design is happening, and the rest is left up to (let's hear it, Marjorie!) "the market" to decide. We all know how that turns out... And don't get me started on the missed opportunities to add critical design and building standards that were left on the table in certain local planning efforts... by the planners themselves. Ugh. This proposal would set a standard for citywide development and not just leave every decision up to the consultant or community group working on their own plan. Additional tweaking could always be added into smaller sector plans, but what Albuquerque desperately needs is a better standard to raise the bar for every neighborhood.

This weekend with my out-of-town best gal in my car, we found ourselves up in the Heights on an errand, an area I'd never take guests wanting to see what Albuquerque has to offer. Sure enough, sitting in endless traffic at endless strip mall stoplights, I felt compelled to apologize for how ugly everything was. In my view, we weren't even in Albuquerque, we were in Anyplace. But as those of us who love Albuquerque for its funky charm know, this City deserves much, much better. We all do. Thanks to this proposal, we might be finally inching toward some progress.

Stay tuned for updates on this one.