Friday, March 23, 2007

American Teen

She’s looking for someone to bother, she says,
belly swelling beneath pink baby-doll tee.

She points down.
This is what she’s been up to.

“School? I don’t go; I got bored.”
But now? He works,” she says.

“I sit at home and watch tv
and call him and tell him how bored I am.

It’s
fun.”


This girl, still running from her nightmares –
still dreaming them up –

too smart for school,
not smart enough to amuse herself,

contorts history
to come full feminist circle,

balloon-sculpture
pre-feminist dream,

only this girl can’t talk at dinner parties
or cook for dinner parties

or do much
of anything at all.


Scared of what she could be
and all that she never could,

she’s chosen this store-bought life
of unhappiness pre-packaged,

the tragedy bold-printed
on the family-proof label:

Take two. Wait twenty years.
Take two more.


What is failure to her
when it all means nothing,

and the disappointment
stretching my cheeks red

just enflames the word
judgment?


I want to understand
what she wants,

but am afraid even this
will prove too much for her.

Why must she
want anything at all?


What can she be feeding her baby
when she barely asks anything of the air?

Her attitude
is bigger than she is.

She looks half an ambition away from scared,
half a lifetime away from bitter.

This girl
is America’s fertile nightmare.

When she laughs,
you can hear empty streets rattle.

Good thing
she does not care.


He works, she says,
and moves off to find someone else to bother.

Somewhere,
he readies himself for her growing anger,

the baby to take its own air,
tiny fingers pushing off against her to gain speed.

I am left empty-handed,
mid-wife to her stillborn dreams.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

TONIGHT: Women and Planning

Maggie says:
An organization near and dear to M3's hearts, the Albuquerque Planners Network is presenting a forum tonight that's sure to generate community, conversation, and connection. Planning always involves community, conversation, and connection... but when women are the focus, it's bound to be especially captivating. This event should be a great one, so we hope to see many of you there!

Women and Planning
Panelists from different sectors of the planning profession will discuss
the role of gender in planning.


Thursday, March 22
6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.
Sawmill Lofts Multipurpose Room, 1801 Bellamah NW

Panel
Connie Chavez, Sawmill Community Land Trust
Paula Garcia, New Mexico Acequia Association
Bernadette Miera, Bernalillo County
Nichole Sanchez-Howell, Village of Corrales
Renee Villareal, Santa Fe County

Moderator
Claudia Isaac, UNM School of Architecture and Planning (and m-pyre hero)

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Slam Semi-Finals

Mikaela espouses:
If you're only going to come to one Slam event to end the season, don't come tonight. Save yourself for the high-stakes final showdown on Saturday, April 7, 7:30 pm at the National Hispanic Cultural Center's Journal Theatre. We've got 600+ seats, and we want them FILLED.

If, on the other hand, you're looking for a real, live reality show drama, attend the semi-finals leading excruciatingly to the elimination of all but the final contestants to build this year's ABQ Slam Team that will compete in Austin to re-claim the National Championship title that slipped through our fingers last year.

It's gonna be a great show. Tonight at Winning Coffee you can see everyone's favorite straight-man, Don McIver, among others. This man is one of the Q's best community organizers. He's so good you probably never heard of him, but if you go to a slam poetry event, chances are his fingerprints are all over it!

If you miss tonight, you have two more semi-finals to see.

MAS Poetry
6:30 PM Call Time
Winning’s Coffee Company
112 Harvard SE
March 21st, 2007

Blue Dragon II
7:30 PM Call Time
Blue Dragon Coffeehouse
1517 Girard NE
March 23rd, 2007

Poetry & Beer
7:30 PM Call Time
The District Bar & Grill
115 4th St. NW
April 5th, 2007

Jessica Lopez

John Paskiewicz

Tony Santiago

Don McIver

Jasmine Cuffee

Zach Kluckman

Ben Boreman

Liza Wolff

Brooke Von Blomberg

Luke Mitchell

Manuel Gonzales

Joe Romero

Sina Aurelia-Sao

Jamen

Stephen

Sean

Angel Ramirez

Jerry Mondragon

Sal Treppiedi

Lenell Storey

James Altimirano


Then the only thing left to see (for this season, anyway) is the Grand SLAM:


And for those who love poetry and want to share, bring your favorite poem & sign up to read it at the open mic. Add a little poetry to your poetry! We all could use the education.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Random Notes: Youtube, Medical Marijuana, Human Rights, Domestic Space

marjorie says...

In the spirit of Maggie, here are my random notes at the moment:

  • I think the youtube Hilary 1984 video is brilliant. Who knows if Barack is behind it?
  • While those two sling mud, I am enjoying Bill Richardson’s latest endorsement of Medical Marijuana. I particularly like his admonishment “My God, let's be reasonable," to folks opposed to a Medical Marijuana bill. Really, in a land beset by alcoholism that results in awful domestic violence and vehicular homicide, you would think that such a benign drug would not be so contentious to people, particularly for medicinal purposes. And frankly, when it comes to marijuana as a recreational drug, we all know so, So many people who use it that it bothers me to think of the danger they put themselves in when they go to acquire it. They endanger their lives when they have to deal with those who peddle all manner of illicit things, which sometimes causes a confluence of bad things. And they endanger their lives by running the risk of being locked up. I think it’s asinine, in fact, that the purchase and use of such a benign drug leads to incarceration. But it does…by the droves in this country. Regardless of whether you use it or not, Marijuana should be legalized, regulated, and taxed. And kudos to Bill for coming out for its use medicinally.
  • The United States Social Forum. This is going to be a really great moment for social justice community based organizations. There’s a large delegation of New Mexico organizations going, and they’re going together. That is kick-ass. Here is the short commercial that SWOP put together to do outreach. All of you should consider going. If you can’t go, consider supporting those who are going, especially the organizations that operate on a shoestring budget.
  • Speaking of incarceration, did folks notice that the U.S. State Department has released their 2006 Country Reports on Human Rights? These are our government’s annual assessments of how countries do in the area of Human Rights. Funny, I don’t see us, aka The United States, on the list. Given that we have the largest prison population in the world (by leaps and bounds) it might be useful to examine our own human rights record first and foremost. This kind of gets at one of those fundamental truths that our parents are supposed to teach us: look at yourself before throwing stones. Or something like that. Our human rights record extends beyond how we treat foreign prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay. Or I should say, it extends deep within our own country. Through neglect of poverty, the criminalization of poor people, and the turning of a blind eye to entrenched racism we allow human rights violations to happen in this country on a daily basis. And our democracy has not proven itself up to the task of correcting these realities.

Ok, its not all politics and social justice on my mind.

  • Arundahti Roy is writing a new novel. Yes, she’s way political but her one and only novel, The God of Small Things, is about the microcosm of life. And it’s so good that she won The Booker Prize for it. I'm looking forward to her next one. Anyhow, in this article she touched on her living arrangement with her husband. Apparently they live in separate houses. To explain this she says: "Living with my own contradictions is hard enough - forcing my political views on someone else, on their lifestyle and the choices they make is not something I want to do. It distorts a relationship beyond redemption. So, I decided to have my own place." I love that recognition, and I think it can be very true. I don’t know how to best order a domestic relationship. It beats me. But I certainly understand how the merging of separate lives, with separate passions and priorities, into one space…can distort a relationship beyond redemption.
  • Speaking of domestic space, spring time has me wanting to open my bedroom window but I’m afraid that I will die from a juniper attack. When will it end? I’m feeling that springtime optimism…that is oh so sweet…but the allergy attacks are hindering me big time.
  • Skiing is over for another year. I sort of want to cry about that but at the same time I feel pretty good about the season. I ski’ed a lot and saw real improvement. I rocked the bumps! And before you ask, yes, it does make me feel very bourgeois. So...now its time to pull out the camping gear...anyone want to backpack way out and lay be a stream?
  • As the big 40 approaches, I've decided I will enter the decade at the same weight as I entered my 30s. No, its not a big stretch. And yes, this is something I can talk about on m-pyre! We have an obesity epidemic in this country folks. Think Food. Our food is killing us. But enough of that for now...this is the non-political section of random notes. Because jogging is so darned hard on my joints these days, I've decided to take up rollerblading. Not only is it great excercise, I've been told its a great off-season sport for improving ones skiing. So you do the math. lol. Anyone want to go zooming on blades with me? Yes, zooming. :-)

Alright, I think that is it.

Go look

Mikaela recommends:
These two links are essential reading today. I've got lots more to say about community being the basis of morality (of course), but ... go read it in full first!

The Onion - 4 Years of Winning in Iraq retrospective issue. Hilarious. Damning. Spot-on.

New York Times - Scientists Finds the Beginnings of Morality in Primate Behavior

Social living requires empathy, which is especially evident in chimpanzees, as well as ways of bringing internal hostilities to an end. Every species of ape and monkey has its own protocol for reconciliation after fights. If two males fail to make up, female chimpanzees will often bring the rivals together, as if sensing that discord makes their community worse off and more vulnerable to attack by neighbors.

Dr. de Waal believes that these actions are undertaken for the greater good of the community, as distinct from person-to-person relationships, and are a significant precursor of morality in human societies. ...

These four kinds of behavior — empathy, the ability to learn and follow social rules, reciprocity and peacemaking — are the basis of sociality.

As Dr. de Waal sees it, human morality may be severely limited by having evolved as a way of banding together against adversaries, with moral restraints being observed only toward the in group, not toward outsiders. “The profound irony is that our noblest achievement — morality — has evolutionary ties to our basest behavior — warfare,” he writes. “The sense of community required by the former was provided by the latter.”

[So racism can evolve to community! Woo-hoo! Good news, everyone. The war in Iraq is only a matter of glacial time, now! We'll definitely be ready to pull troop out in another 200,000-1,000,000 years. Hang in there, soldiers!]

Biologists are allowed an even smaller piece of the action by Jesse Prinz, a philosopher at the University of North Carolina. He believes morality developed after human evolution was finished and that moral sentiments are shaped by culture... “[R]ecognition of equal dignity for all human beings … seems to be unprecedented in the animal world.”

Dr. de Waal says, “In the actual world, we are confronted with different people who might be targets of our sympathy. And the business of ethics [and planning, hello!] is deciding who to help and why and when.”

Morality, [Dr. de Waal] writes, is “a sense of right and wrong that is born out of groupwide systems of conflict management based on shared values.” The building blocks of morality are not nice or good behaviors but rather mental and social capacities for constructing societies “in which shared values constrain individual behavior through a system of approval and disapproval.”

[Isn't that also a great definition of community-building or planning in general? I think so!]

Natural selection favors organisms that survive and reproduce, by whatever means. And [morality] has provided people, with “a compass for life’s choices that takes the interests of the entire community into account, which is the essence of human morality.”

[Planners as the ultimate in morality. Wow. Evolutionary pinnacle and all that. Is that why this is so damned complicated?]

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Albuquerque Anti-War March Pictures, March 17, 2007

marjorie says...

Here are some of my favorite signs from today’s anti-war march and rally. There were about 1000 people there. For a more comprehensive look at the day, see Jo Ann's pictures on SWOPblogger--they're great.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket



Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Friday, March 16, 2007

Mountain Time brain dump

Maggie says:
Blogging energy has been nil lately, but there's lots and lots that I've been reading and discussing and doing, so I promise I haven't been brain-dead. Before jumping on a plane, here it is, rapid-fire style:

  • I wish this was me. This NYT profile of Catherine Orenstein gets me fired up in all the ways that dangerously prompt me to re-envision myself and my career. This project is brilliant, and the piece perfectly captures why Orenstein is the perfect woman to convince other women to write. Love those smart gals tearing down structural oppression.
  • Movie love. I was just floored by Black Snake Moan, and I'm seriously enchanted with Craig Brewer. Actually, it's gone from blushing crush to full-on infatuation. This movie takes everything Hustle & Flow started and kicks it up about a thousand notches. I dare say Brewer's our most lyrical and honest U.S. filmmaker right now, and if you don't get it, fine. His challenge to see past stereotypes for the truth and humanity embedded there is one not suited for everybody. And besides, Gene and I will have fun sneering at you behind your back if you don't get him. :-) (And PS while we're on movies: the Alexander Payne event at the Kimo last week was great!)
  • Who knew? (Probably every local but me, since I'm not really local...) But Teresa Tapia rocks. Really. This woman is tough, and I admire the hell out of her no-bullshit approach to her husband.
  • A raid is a raid is a raid. Last Sunday, the Ms trekked up to Santa Fe to hear Barbara Ehrenreich speak, and the event was fabulous. Lots of chatter there about the recent immigration raids in Santa Fe, and some impressive responses from Mayor Coss and the progressive community about the networks they're establishing to help warn families in advance of future raids and to assure them of their rights. A day after the talk, I couldn't help but recall what's happening in the City Different as I read the latest from New Orleans, where FEMA is raiding mobile home parks and giving disaster-weary residents just 48 hours to leave. The parallels make my head spin, not to mention my heart hurt. Aren't we better than this?
  • Dad knows best. I was chastised by my father for not being on top of the Walter Reed series as soon as it was published in the Post weeks ago, and as usual, he was right. Days after he was disappointed to hear I hadn't read the Post that weekend and predicted that people were about to be hearing a lot more about it, the outcry heated up nationwide. I think good 'ol Dad has always been my personal political barometer. Maybe he should be everyone's, too. His instincts are always right-on; someone should pay him for that.
  • "You, sir, are no Michael Dukakis." This Salon piece that draws parallels between Bill Richardson and Michael Dukakis has been amusing me all week. Now, I'm biased as hell, because I was privileged enough to get to know Dukakis very well through the years in Boston, and I don't think there's a better man around. But, if the paraphrase fits...
  • Juniper sucks. This City sounds like a wheezing, sneezing, hellhole right now. And we look awful, too - at the Chama taproom the other night Jessie and I must've appeared to be crying our eyes out to each other. But no, just dealing with a constant stream of allergy tears running out of our eyes. Too bad I love gin and tonics so much. But still, I need to leave soon for juniper-free environs, at least for a weekend. Oh wait, I am! Happy trails, everyone.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Finally! Useful Academic Research: Partisan Profiling of Fed. Judges on Bush's Watch

Mikaela re-posts:
Lest you think the Gonzales 8 were isolated instances, this comes via White House Briefing in the Washington Post:

Donald Shields and John Cragan, two professors of communication, have compiled a database of investigations and/or indictments of candidates and elected officials by U.S. attorneys since the Bush administration came to power.

Of the 375 cases they identified, 10 [3%] involved independents, 67 [17%] involved Republicans and 298 [79%] involved Democrats. The main source of this partisan tilt was a huge disparity in investigations of local politicians, in which Democrats were seven times as likely as Republicans to face Justice Department scrutiny.
This is not an indication of guilt. It's a clear indication that once again, Bush condones blurring the line between Executive Power and the other branches of government. I see he believes in checks; it's the balances he doesn't seem to recognize.

Utterly outrageous.

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Monday, March 12, 2007

More on Wilson's Dastardly Deeds to Keep Her Seat

Mikaela says:
Great L.A. Times article on Heather Wilson's role in the Iglesias firing that's heating up the next beltway GOP scandal, which is putting pressure on the Bush administration to:

  1. Fire Attorney General Alberto Gonzales,
  2. Fire Karl Rove, and
  3. Stop firing competent federal judges and replacing them with toe-the-line party hacks.

Excerpts:

It was just three weeks before election day 2006, and Rep. Heather A. Wilson was on the ropes. Opinion polls showed the New Mexico Republican trailing her Democratic opponent in a tough campaign.
...

One person in a good position to help Wilson was U.S. Atty. David C. Iglesias, who was investigating Democratic corruption in her home state. A late-breaking indictment of Democratic officials could help Wilson distance herself from sex and lobbying scandals plaguing the GOP in Washington.

That's why eyebrows raised when it was recently disclosed that, in the heat of her fight for political survival, Wilson called Iglesias to ask about possible indictments. So did Domenici.

Both lawmakers have denied that they called Iglesias for political purposes or pressured him. But questions about their actions have turned what might have been a narrow investigation of the Justice Department's late-2006 decision to fire Iglesias and seven other U.S. attorneys into a broader controversy about the ethical limits of lawmakers' influence on prosecutors.
...
Democrats see the New Mexico episode as indicative of the lengths Republicans were willing to go to gain political advantage in the crucial midterm elections that ended up changing the balance of power in Congress.
...
Iglesias understood that news of indictments against them would probably boost Wilson's chances.

"I was aware that public corruption was a huge battle being waged by Patricia Madrid and Heather Wilson in the 1st District," he said. "And I assiduously tried to stay out of that fight."

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Ann Coulter Does Not Speak For Me

Maggie gushes:
This is brilliant. I think I'll bookmark it so that every time this terrible woman says something horribly offensive I can feel a little bit better about the world. Whew!

Go play "Ann Coulter Does Not Speak For Me"... trust me.

Today is International Women's Day

Maggie says:
So go and hug a woman and tell her thanks. Gather all the ladies and go out on the town. Read feminist children's books to your daughters. Send out all the gender equality karma you can muster.

Every day, I mean. Today?

How about writing a check to your local domestic violence shelter, that fantastic woman running for office in your town, or the far-away women's cooperative that sells the best coffee you've ever tasted?

For example.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Torture and Apple Pie...just a way of life

marjorie says...

In the latest episode in the ongoing torture and illegal detainment practices of the United States, U.S. military hearings begin this week for 14 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay who were originally held last year in secret CIA prisons elsewhere. The fact that there was an uproar about the secret CIA prisons, that they were even exposed in the first place, does say a lot about the ability of the international community (which includes U.S. citizens) to find information and effectively pressure the U.S. government. The fact that the secret prisons existed to begin with, on the other hand, is a damning indictment of our country, particularly given how we like to make pronouncements about the human rights records of other countries.

According to the NYT,
the hearings ..."are to determine formally if the prisoners, who include the accused mastermind of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, and 13 others, are properly held as enemy combatants and may be tried by special military courts."

So, let's get this straight: The U.S. military is holding secret hearings in order to determine if these fellows are "enemy combatants," and I presume therefore "prisoners of war," in order to determine if they can then try them in military courts, which do not provide them with the due process all others are supposed to be afforded in the U.S. courts. Am I getting the circularity of this right?

How unbiased do folks think the U.S. military is going to be? Well, according to Bryan Whitman of the Pentagon, "I think everybody recognises these individuals are unique for the role they have played in terrorist operations and in combat operations against US forces."

That gives us a little bit of a clue.

Reading further in the press reports, we find that:

  • No defense counsel will be present;
  • Transcripts will be released that are heavily edited for "national security";
  • No prisoners names will be released in the transcripts;
  • The circumstances of their capture will not be released; and
  • The Defense Department refuses to say whether or not they will release in the transcripts any allegations by the prisoners of torture.

So, essentially, there are a number of men who were abducted by the CIA and taken to secret prisons, where we all know they were tortured. They were then transferred to Guantanamo Bay after the public found out about those prisons and reacted accordingly (because many of us do operate from a set of ideals and values). Now the military is secretly determining if they get to try the prisoners in military tribunals.

Folks, our country is founded on checks and balances. The only way these prisoners get a fair shake is if another body has access to all that secret information and has equal power to check the military in these proceedings. Should that body be public? Maybe, maybe not. But it should definitely exist, and it should be completely independent.

Women in Action: The Run-down

Mikaela says:
What a beautiful event. I admit that as it drew closer and closer, I was actually wishing I could just call in sick. I was totally exhausted and had no idea where I was going to get the energy for this. Then it looked like no one was going to come. I was ready to go home.

All of a sudden, we were started, the energy flowed through the room, and we had 40 people in our audience, feeding fuel to the fire.

These women were amazing. All different, all individual, yet somehow as we heard story after story, the picture of women's pivotal role in social change, in our communities, came into focus. There was a fabulous discussion, too. The audience was right there with the hard questions -- "You've taken on such big issues. Most days do you feel optimistic or depressed?" and "Given that so much has actually gone backward from the 60s, how do you still keep working and pushing to move forward?"

Here were some of the great lines of the night (some may be paraphrased, I admit):

  • "Consciousness creates choices." -- Joann Bejar
  • "I ask myself three questions about the way I spend my money, my time, and my relationships: 1) Is it giving me as much fulfillment as I put in? 2) It is in alignment with my values? 3) Is it in alignment with my purposes?" -- Margo Ganster
  • "We ask our teens: How can you cause social change? How can you get beyond limitations? What are your core beliefs that hold you back?" -- Myra Murphy-Jacobs
  • "Working for Corporate America is a little like jumping in with the wolves, but it's giving me the tools that companies have used for years to get ahead." -- Dory Wegryzn
  • "I'm driven by desperation. But you have to do what you can with two small hands. You just have to keep flailing them until people see." -- Naomi Natale
  • "I had dreams of my own, but for 27 years in an abusive relationship, I could not see people, even though I like being with others, or leave the house, or do anything. When I divorced my husband, it was like I was reborn again." -- Sandra Montes
  • "Non-profits have a problem. They're too territorial about their projects. As long as they're fighting each other over crumbs, they will never succeed. And until we face the issues of race and gender -- which I've seen in every non-profit -- we can't move forward together." -- Dory Wegryn
  • "We're in a better space than we ever have been before. We're at the tipping point, and we're right there where we need to be when this system stops working." -- Joann Bejar
  • "I've faced a lot of hardships in my life. I ask myself: How do I harness this energy of sorrow? I have a promise to myself -- a dream, a vision: That we can powerfully and effectively communicate to the extent that we wake up the compassion for each other that will energize us to work for change. We teach a workshop to teens that focuses on 'awakening the dreamer, changing the dream.'" -- Myra Murphy-Jacobs
  • "I've made a choice to read success stories." -- Margo Ganster
  • "I focus on our successes. I refuse to think about everything that still needs to be done. That's overwhelming. I'm stubborn. If someone says I can't do something, I do the opposite." -- Sandra Montes
  • "Be silent and notice what interests you. Follow that until you know what you need to know. Then move on to the next thing." -- Margo Ganster
  • "We've faced lots of barriers, namely politics and men." -- Sandra Montes
  • "In our organization, we have no hierarcy. We share the same title. When there's a problem or someone's uncomfortable, we talk about it. When somebody hears you, frequently nothing has to change." -- Margo Ganster

And that, dear friends, is exactly the power of events like last night. Sometimes when you make the space for people to tell their stories and be heard, nothing has to change. Sometimes, that's all that has to happen for change to begin.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Reminder: TONIGHT! Women in Action @ the NHCC

Mikaela reminds:
TODAY,March 6 at 6 pm, the NHCC is hosting Women in Action, a panel discussion of local women activists, artists, and entrepreneurs, also as part of Women & Creativity. This one's near and dear to my little political heart. The panel includes:

  • Dory Wegryzn, who was instrumental in forming the Sawmill Community Land Trust,
  • Sandra Montes, who's fought tirelessly for the rights of Pajarito Mesa residents in Albuquerque's South Valley,
  • Joann Bejar, who's done everything from being a filmaker, labor organizer, to mom,
  • Naomi Natale, who created the Cradle Project -- an art project that calls attention to and raises funds for children orphaned by disease and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa,
  • Myra Murphy-Jacob of Sustainable Global Leadership Alliance, which trains and sends leaders to other countries, where they help train others as leaders in sustainable, eco- and community-friendly business practices, and
  • Margo Ganster of Green It!, a local company that helps other companies to incorporate ways to be "green," adding to the sustainability of our economy & our environment

Libby Found Guilty!

Mikaela cheers:
Libby's verdict came back: Guilty of 4 of 5 counts, including lying about his role in the leak of an undercover CIA officer's identity:

  • two counts of perjury,
  • one count of making false statements and
  • one count of obstruction of justice,
acquitting him of single count of lying to the FBI.

THAT. ROCKS.

Oh, boy, oh, boy. What will the fall out be??? One can only hope for a great game of dominoes.

Monday, March 05, 2007

NM on the national political stage

Mikaela says:
No time this morning to speculate, but NM is smack-dab in the center of D.C. gossip today, half because of Domenici's recent admission of tampering in an ongoing investigation of NM Democrats and half because of David Brooke's musings (subscription required) about Richardson's presidential candidacy. Apparently, Richardson's the one to watch.

The evil Heather Wilson is lurking stage left in all of this. Senator Wilson? Shudder.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Basic thought of the day

marjorie says...

Last weekend I had an interesting conversation with some of my historian friends who made the claim that Fidel Castro was the most influential man of our era. I took exception to that statement immediately but their assertion that his shepherding of the Cuban socialist project deserves significant credit can’t be dismissed. It was a short conversation but maybe one of them will chime in here and elaborate. Essentially, the gist I got of their argument is that Cuba, as the only socialist project to survive into this century, had been enormously influential throughout the world by inspiring and supporting third world national and socialist liberation movements, and by successfully facing down the monolith that is the United States.

I can’t argue with these statements but I really don’t think he’s been the single most influential person. That’s a big statement. What immediately came to my mind when I thought of influence were those men who led non-violent liberation movements, such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King. The tactics employed by these movements have changed the world. Non-violent civil-disobedience isn’t a new concept to our time, but it is a form of protest that has been employed incredibly effectively during what has been arguably the most violent era in human history.

At my workplace, we have this quote by MLK hanging on the wall above the computer I use, in which he addresses violence:

"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate...Returning violence for violence multiples violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: Only love can do that."

Any of us who really reflects on these words knows the truth of them. We know it from our history, from our own personal relationships, from the communities we live in, and from the results we can plainly see on the world stage when violence is used to obtain objectives.

Here are my questions:

How can we teach non-violent behavior to children on an interpersonal level when we model violent behavior, both emotionally and physically, to the people in our lives every day?

How can we teach it on a societal level when our solution to social problems is to lock up an entire sector of our population? Did you all know we have the largest prison population in the world?

And how can we condemn the use of force by young people to solve their problems when we tolerate a government that has constructed a global military and police infrastructure that makes war and employs torture to impose our will on others?

Many people will respond to me, probably not here, that I am a doom and gloom person when it comes to the U.S. The reaction will be, why can't you say something good for once. Ok, I will (although if you check your gut reaction you will recognize that I often do). Ready? Here goes:

We are better than this. We can be.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Why I all of a sudden like David Geffen

marjorie says...

"Amnesty International considers Leonard Peltier to be a political prisoner whose avenues of redress have long been exhausted.... Amnesty International recognizes that a retrial is no longer a feasible option and believes that Leonard Peltier should be immediately and unconditionally released."

-- Amnesty International, April 6, 1999

You can find the Leonard Peltier case here. The fact is that the federal government targeted the American Indian Movement as well as the Black Panthers, not to mention the anti-war movement and other left political formations, during the 60s and 70s...through a program called Cointelpro. These movements were infiltrated and disrupted from within, and harrassed, intimidated, and sometimes simply murdered from without. They were criminalized, many of their members ended up behind bars, and ultimately they were decimated to the point of extinction. Leonard Peltier is one such political prisoner in this country.

Who knew that David Geffen is a supporter of and an advocate for the release of Leonard Peltier from prison? I didn't. Apparently, one reason at least for his disaffection from the Clintons, and his financial support of Obama, is the failure of Bill Clinton to pardon Peltier in the final days of his presidency. Clinton could have easily done so, especially given the widespread support for Peltier's release among the core Democrat constituency.

From an interview with Maureen Dowd of the New York Times:

''Marc Rich getting pardoned? An oil-profiteer expatriate who left the country rather than pay taxes or face justice?'' Geffen told Times' columnist Maureen Dowd.

And then, referring to the Peltier case, Geffen continued, ''Yet another time when the Clintons were unwilling to stand for the things that they genuinely believe in.

"Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it's troubling," Geffen said.

Yes, David, they do lie. And there are plenty of people who remember this particular disappointment right along with you. I remember it clearly.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Oh, Vilsack was in?

Maggie says:
I'm sure I'm not alone in being underwhelmed by this morning's news that former Iowa governor Tom Vilsack is bowing out of the 2008 race. Can't really miss a candidate I'd never seriously considered to start with... Yet I find myself strangely wistful about his snazzy campaign signs. Interesting graphic design on campaign propaganda? Talk about bringing something new to the field! Oh well.

See ya in Iowa, Tom.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

The fish tacos won't tell

Maggie says:
Sometimes I'd love a transcript of M-time to post on the blog. Tonight at the Gold Street Caffé, over yummy food and wine (always wine!), M3 had its first official Election '08 discussion.

What's continually surprising to me about the three of us - and I think it's fairly evident here on m-pyre - is that although we agree about so much, we tend get to the same bottom lines for entirely different reasons and in entirely different ways. I love that about us, and it's absolutely apparent in our first talk about the crop of Democratic candidates for 2008. What strikes us all about this election is that it's going to be extremely interesting to watch, it's going to be a lot of fun to write about, and most importantly, it's still very far away. That said, I'm not naming names now - there's plenty of time for that. Instead (and since I'm in a playful mood, thanks mostly to the fabulous women's poetry performed tonight at Firestorm), I offer the following tantalizing teasers*:

  • Which candidate do we all have gut reactions against, but for verrrry different reasons?
  • Which candidate is bound to have some Slick Willie-style scandals saunter out of the shadows?
  • Which candidate is peaking too soon?
  • Which candidate is our gut reaction first choice?
  • Which candidate do we feel compelled to applaud theoretically, but won't vote for?
  • Which candidate would we like better if his/her house was smaller?
  • Which candidate's résumé might offer the most compelling community experience?
  • Which candidate is a bozo racist?
  • Which candidate talks trade and poverty and actually gets it?
*As an extra tease, some of these just might be the same candidates. And some candidates aren't mentioned at all.

So what do we disagree on? All the twists on the path toward those answers, really. But in particular:

  • The meaning and significance of family dynasties
  • The significance of gender
  • The value of hard-nosed critique from the left
  • How much a happy marriage matters
  • Whether we should road-trip to Durango or White Sands first

As for prizes for guessing the right answers (I'm looking at you, Rhys)... isn't the march toward '08 with the three of us prize enough?! (I said I was feeling playful, remember?)

PS: And introducing... Ta Da! The "Election '08" label! It's here to stay, folks. Guess we'd all better get used to it.

What Country Is This? What Year Is This??

Mikaela says:
I freely admit I have been out of it for years now. Nerdy, political, getting older all the time -- I've got my head buried firmly in internet news.

But I just stumbled on a dress code policy for a local middle school (6-8 grades, or 11-14 year olds roughly). As you read, think about what country this sounds like. What year.


Shirts: Polo shirts of a solid color. Polo shirts must have collars with no more than three buttons and sleeves of approximately 5 inches in length. Logos allowed in front only, no bigger than 2-inch square, and must conform to the Logo policy as stated below.

Flannel jackets/shirts (plaid) are not allowed.

Pants/Belts: Docker style pants of cotton or corduroy in any solid color and worn at waist level.

Pants that do not comply with our dress policy: Sweats, workout pants, nylon pants, jeans of any color, cargo, carpenter, skater, coveralls, overalls, baggy, and form fitting (extra tight) pants. Pants cannot have leg zippers, fasteners, metal objects, or pockets on leg of pants and must be worn at waist level.

Shorts, Skirts and Skorts: No shorter than fingertip length [above the knee] and worn at waist level.

Sweaters and Vests: Any solid color worn over a Polo shirt. Logos allowed in front only, no bigger than 2-inch square, and must conform to the Logo policy as stated below. Sweaters and vests may not have any form of writing other than allowed logos.

Jackets and Sweatshirts: Logos of any size allowed but must conform to the Logo policy as stated below. Hooded jackets and sweatshirts allowed but hoods may not to be worn indoors.

Accessories: No buckles, chains, metal objects, studs, sweatbands, spiked jewelry, sunglasses, hairnets, and bandanas. No more than two items of jewelry.

Hats and any form of headgear are not allowed on campus.


Reading this list, my mouth was literally hanging open in disbelief.

I remember all the hoopla about uniforms, and I remember them getting firmly put down as a good idea. Well, they're back. I'm totally SHOCKED that JEANS ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED. Really? Jeans? Are you kidding me? That's right. You've gotta wear solid-color dockers or corduroy. And polo shirts of a solid color. NO FLANNEL. Not that flannel was ever the BEST fashion choice, but ... harmful to an educational environment? Hard to believe. I'm guessing flannel is "gang-related" or something? This hardly seems reasonable to me.

What have we let happen? Were things really bad enough to warrant this? I'm imagining passing period looks like something straight out of Dr. Seuss! Where are kids buying all those polos?? Is that why polos have not died out as a style? What irony, that the polo is now the strait-jacket for APS kids. Good grief.

m stands for "moving"

Mikaela says:
I personally love it when life is moving too fast to get caught up in the immobility of rage at current events. There's plenty I'm fuming about (Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, New Orleans, Libby trial, executive orders, creeping fascism of the Bush administration that seems to go all-but unnoticed by the general public... whew, better stop there!), but for a little while, I've got too much on my plate here in the Q to worry myself into inaction about the rest of the world.

It's all about doing what you can where you can, right?

So this evening (starting around 7 pm), I'm taking part in an event for women: Firestorm, at the Winning Coffee Co. on Harvard & Central (m-pyre readers know all about how much we love Winning!), hosted by Maresa Thompson, organizer of the fabulous National Poetry Slam in 2005. I'm even going to read a poem during the open mic! Then, with my bestest m-friends, we'll cheer and support our fellow creative women, strong women w/ strong voices telling us all what we need to hear, even when we sometimes don't want to listen. Tonight's all about listening!

Thursday, if I didn't have a conflict, I'd be going to see "When the Levees Broke," Spike Lee's documentary on the Katrina disaster in New Orleans, being shown by the Albuquerque chapter of Planners Network, made up of UNM Community & Regional Planning students & community members, at Out Ch-Yonda in Barelas (4th & Santa Fe). 6 pm.

On Saturday, I'll be going to hear local poets read at the Main Library downtown. How cool is it that our urban library is opening its doors to a largely urban movement of spoken-word poetry. Totally cool. That's from 3-5 pm. Afterward, I'll join Lisa Gill @ 7 pm for a reading celebrating her 2007 National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship in UNM's Student Union Building (SUB) Acoma Room. Who else wins an award and throws a party for her community? Lisa rocks.

Friday, March 2, the NHCC, Harwood, ABQ Slams, & IPI are putting on Women Centerstage as part of the NHCC's Women & Creativity festival. We've gathered some of the coolest women poets around -- Lisa Gill, Esther Griego, Valerie Martinez, Demetria Martinez -- and paired them with Rah Goddess, who some of you may have heard and been electrified by on NPR's Bioneers show this summer. She's a hip-hop feminist poet and performance artist who coined the term "floetry" and spawned a whole generation of empowered and empowering women performers. Show starts at 7. Afterward, an all-women slam will choose the winner to represent Albuquerque at the World of Women (WoW) national poetry slam in Chicago this October. A hot night to be sure. Not to be missed.



Tuesday, March 6, 6 pm, the NHCC is hosting Women in Action, a panel discussion of local women activists, artists, and entrepreneurs, also as part of Women & Creativity. This one's near and dear to my little political heart. The panel includes:

  • Dory Wegryzn, who was instrumental in forming the Sawmill Community Land Trust,
  • Sandra Montes, who's fought tirelessly for the rights of Pajarito Mesa residents in Albuquerque's South Valley,
  • Joann Bejar, who's done everything from being a filmaker, labor organizer, to mom,
  • Naomi Natale, who created the Cradle Project -- an art project that calls attention to and raises funds for children orphaned by disease and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa,
  • Myra Murphy-Jacob of Sustainable Global Leadership Alliance, which trains and sends leaders to other countries, where they help train others as leaders in sustainable, eco- and community-friendly business practices, and
  • Margo Ganster of Green It!, a local company that helps other companies to incorporate ways to be "green," adding to the sustainability of our economy & our environment

In between all that, I'll be finishing an anthology of Voces students work for UNM Press and putting together an anthology of ABQ Slam poets w/ fellow IPI members Danny Solis, Susan McAllister, and Don McIver.

Oh, and planning a wedding.

Busy? Me? No.....

Lord help me the day I slow down long enough to really soak in the news from around the world. It's not looking good, but I'm trying to do what I can to support good things in my community. In the seconds between whirling from event to event, I wish peace for us all.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

"Democratic" Iraq

Mikaela says:

Today from Democracy Now, we have this news:

Iraq to Expel Thousands, Spy on Iraqis in Baghdad Crackdown
The Iraqi government has announced a series of controversial new measures in its crackdown on Baghdad. Tens of thousands of displaced Iraqis have been told to leave homes Iraq says are being occupying illegally. The Iraqi government also says it will eavesdrop on phone calls and open mail at will. Military forces will be authorized to break into any homes and cars judged to be dangerous. Iraq also says it will close its borders with Iran and Syria, increase military checkpoints, and extend Baghdad’s military curfew.

I bet the Iraqis are more grateful than ever to have had Democracy thrust upon them. Makes you teary to see a fledgling Democracy in action, doesn't it? To see liberty take root?

Ah, we Liberators feel our hearts swell to overflowing at the terrible beauty we spread to the world. You're welcome!

Happy Valentine's Day, Iraq.

Yours truly, forever,

America

Happy V-Day to my girls

Maggie says:
On previous Valentine’s Days I’ve expounded upon how this holiday can be problematic, given that it makes too many people feel bad about themselves and promotes buying horrendously cheesy gifts (note to men: pink stuffed animals are only a good idea when you’re in middle school). But this Valentine’s Day, I’m feeling particularly uncynical – maybe it’s the snow outside, which is just incredibly beautiful right now. I can’t bear to be biting, so instead I’ll send a V-Day message to two women who should hear good things all day long, every day: my Ms.

  • Happy Valentine’s Day to Marjorie, to her eyes full of flashing fierceness, to her gentleness that comes so full of wisdom you have to stop in order to soak it all in, to her abundant use of the term “lol” in e-mails, and to her quilt collection that brings a bit of home to a town where I sometimes desperately need it.
  • Happy Valentine’s Day to Mikaela, to her never-ending search for the right answer, to her love of words and culture and truth and creativity and her commitment to all of them, for the way she can still show me New Mexico in a brand new way, and for that beautiful moment when she stops thinking and just starts to laugh.


We’ll be out and about tonight, but I’m not allowed to say where or when. Let’s just say that words are involved, and we’ll be in full-on cheerleading mode. (But sorry, not cheerleading uniforms…)

Have a great day full of love, everyone.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

I *heart* Kid Ethnic

Maggie gushes:
My pal Saleem makes me as giddy as a kid on a sugar high sometimes. Or... just a "hot mama" high on wasabi rice crackers?

See for yourself why my crush endures.

Surfing the wave of spontaneous thought

marjorie says...

In his commentary on Counterpunch, jazz pianist George Duke laments what he calls the Europeanization of jazz music, claiming that as an art form contemporary musicians are moving jazz away from it African American roots. He makes the point that jazz is not about perfect execution, like a classical piece should be, but rather all about improvisation and attempting new ideas during performance. Here is an excerpt from the article:


“Now this is important, because many young jazz pianists sound like they have rehearsed everything down to the last sixteenth note. And even if they haven't, it feels that way. Most of the playing I've heard is virtually mistake free.

“But something is missing! I have to look hard to find that free expression of emotion, living on a tight rope, experimenting, trying difficult passages and maybe not totally executing it correctly but making the attempt.

“I've always felt that Miles Davis' blown notes were part of his musical canvas. If he played all the notes spot on, would his music have felt the same--I doubt it!

“And if that's true, then perfection must be overrated, at least as far as jazz is concerned.

“Yeah I know, I can hear it now--"the pursuit of perfection is a noble quest for any artist." That's true --but when technique becomes more important than telling a musical story or surfing the wave of spontaneous thought, then I believe it is a misguided quest.”


I love that last sentence. As I was reading this, I couldn’t help but think that perfection is overrated in terms of many things. In this sense, for instance, the classical music of political philosophy would be ideology. And to play it perfectly would lead to a bit of rigidity in ones thinking. I guess my preference is to think of political philosophy as being more akin to jazz…found everywhere, from our base communities all the way to up on high. I can think of more analogies as well. Something tells me this is going to be the theme of my Tuesday...



Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Comments down

...Sorry. Stay tuned.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Abusive parents and their so-called rights

marjorie says...

Imagine my surprise that my homestate of Texas, firmly controlled by Republicans, is the first to mandate that all young girls get innoculated with Gardasil, the cervical cancer vaccine. Republican Governor Rick Perry's executive order has ignited a fierce protest by Republicans in the state legislature who insist he doesn't have the authority to mandate the vaccination. The row is actually quite instructive for the schism in the Republican party...between those who pander to the evangelicals that want to boil every single decision down to the possibility that someone will have pre-marital sex, or simply fornicate, and those who form their decisions regarding public policy through a more broad based process that seriously considers public health and safety.

The argument against making the drug a requirement for young girls remains two fold: the right of parents to make all decisions for their children, and the charge that vaccinating young girls against cancer will lead them to have pre-marital sex. That last bit is so completely ridiculous not to mention asinine, not to mention grossly sexist, that I won't even address it. What I do want to address is the parental rights argument. Here is Governor Perry's response to his Republican naysayers:

"Never before have we had an opportunity to prevent cancer with a simple vaccine. While I understand the concerns expressed by some, I stand firmly on the side of protecting life. The HPV vaccine does not promote sex, it protects women's health. In the past, young women who have abstained from sex until marriage have contracted HPV from their husbands and faced the difficult task of defeating cervical cancer. This vaccine prevents that from happening.

"Providing the HPV vaccine doesn't promote sexual promiscuity anymore than providing the Hepatitis B vaccine promotes drug use. If the medical community developed a vaccine for lung cancer, would the same critics oppose it claiming it would encourage smoking?
Finally, parents need to know that they have the final decision about whether or not their daughter is vaccinated. I am a strong believer in protecting parental rights, which is why this executive order allows them to opt out."


I must say, I am very pleased to see a Republican take a principled stand on such matters, as I always am. And I'm also amused to watch him have to answer the completely ridiculous charges about premarital sex. The issue I have, though, is the opt-out provisions for parents. Why penalize some young girls for life just because they have ridiculous parents?

While I agree that parental rights are very important, the fact is that too many parents make wrong-headed and at times abusive decisions for their children...decisions that adversely affect their children's futures. I'd like to know why the rights of adults regarding their children are valued so highly at the expense of the future adult lives of their children. Human beings are subject to their parents for 16-17 years, then have another 3-4 times that many years to live as adults. As a society we already take some measures to protect children from their parents and other adults. For instance, child pornography, child labor, sexual acts with children...are all against the law. But I would suggest we don't go nearly far enough. As a society we provide very few safe havens for children who need to escape abusive parents. Many children grow up in abject fear of their parents but have no other place to go, other than the street of course. Why do we think this is ok?

Personally, given the capacity of our society to make sure all young girls are vaccinated with this drug that prevents cancer I would consider it abusive to not do so. If I were an eleven year old girl I would want society to trump my parents on this issue. And as an adult not too many years later I would be incredibly angry if I were one of those few who did not get the vaccination because of ridiculous parents and a society that didn't value my long life over my abusive parents so-called rights.

Self-indulgent label talk

Maggie says:
Reporting live from Adventures in Insomnia: Night Three!

Instead of getting beauty sleep or dreaming about my upcoming trip to Los Angeles, I started playing around with the new blogger labels tonight instead. (Why yes, just as fulfilling as sleeping! Thanks for asking!)

Secretly, I love the idea of cerebral organization of one's writing, of clean categorization followed by thoughtful analysis of writing patterns. Labeling all of m-pyre, it occurs to me, could become one of those mythic tasks - think John Cusack autobiographically reorganizing his record collection in High Fidelity.

So far, I've labeled 50 m-pyre posts. There are 929 total posts.

I am an Aries. Will I see this project through to completion? Doubtful. (Although if I don't start sleeping again soon, it's a possibility.)

Some interesting findings from labeling m-pyre:

  • I'm not very creative with labels. I thought of all these cute, catchy phrases (actually, they were all sarcastic and insider in tone, but that's kind of m-pyre's version of cute and catchy), but I decided they would become annoying over time. So my labels are fairly basic, but I'm hoping the other Ms will spice things up a bit.
  • In examining the last 50 m-pyre posts, it appears that I have only blogged ten times since November 11. I knew it was bad, but yikes. My post-election showing on the blog has been downright pathetic. Worse, of those ten measly posts in three months, the vast majority are only a paragraph long and either link to something else or say that I hope to be writing again soon. That brings us up to last week, when Molly kicked my lazy writer's ass back into shape. The moral here? I've been a very, very bad blogger since the '06 election. But the silver lining? I've personally been a very, very happy person since the '06 election. Not that they're related... But um, how lame is it to say that I hope to be writing again soon?
  • I wanted to have a label called "Self-Indulgent," which is really the only thing to call certain posts. I briefly worried that M&M might get annoyed if I labeled one of their old posts self-indulgent, before realizing that only my stuff would get the label, anyway. Yet by that time, I'd moved on to the more community-minded, friendly "M-time" label to categorize our personal ramblings and random musings. That said, this post will be labeled "M-time," but we all know what it should really be called.
  • 50 down, 879 to go. So many more posts to label and labels to invent, so... much time, apparently.
Sleep. I need sleep. Marjorie, Mikaela, save me from myself!

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Weekend reading

Maggie says:
I find myself fairly uninterested in the Superbowl this weekend (despite the compelling coaching storyline), and am instead puttering around in typical un-American fashion. Such puttering affords me lots of time to read, go shoe-shopping, have the strongest margaritas on the planet with Marjorie's fam, and go hiking. So before I meet Mikaela to head over to the foothills, here's what's peaking my interest word-wise this weekend:

  • More than good food and friendliness. Facing South, a fantastic blog produced by one of my fave organizations, compiled a list of its top-five books on Southern populist history. I have a couple of these, and the comments remind me that I'm still hanging on to a Loomis loaner that I need to return. This list is a great place to start diving into the rich promise that those who love the South know it very much holds. After you're primed with good 'ol Southern history, give this important Nation cover story a try before you start trash-talking about how we'll be safe ignoring the South in '08. Who knows... it just might influence your pick for the party.
  • Biden: not just inarticulate. Joe Biden's recent gaffe is, as this Times article points out, not a gaffe at all, but the latest proof that most Americans are still surprised when non-whites sound smart. The word of attack here is "articulate," and with good insight this article points out the so-called compliments we're compelled to offer up for non-whites who sound... white. '"Al Sharpton is incredibly articulate,” said Tricia Rose, professor of Africana Studies at Brown University. “But because he speaks with a cadence and style that is firmly rooted in black rhetorical tradition you will rarely hear white people refer to him as articulate.”'
  • Off to La-La Land. I'm heading to Los Angeles next week for a conference, and nothing has been amusing me in advance of the trip more than Curbed LA, a deliciously acerbic blog on planning and real estate in LA. More East Coast-oriented readers might enjoy the original NYC-based Curbed a little more. Same snarky real estate banter, only denser. Where else can I be pointed to the coolest Google image search result ever (for "urban planner") and news like this: "In order to make sure that Chinatown is catching up to the rest of downtown yuppie invasion, the City Council fast-tracked the approval of a new mixed-use development at 900 N. Broadway." Hee hee hee... Oh and!, see the sister blogs of Curbed for foodie talk: Eater and Eater LA. How much would I love to see a Curbed ABQ one day... Any takers?
  • Local poets at it again. Yesterday I was lucky enough to get a preview of The Wellesley Poems, the forthcoming tome from local poet Adam Rubinstein. Adam's lastest poems are ruminations on growing up in the suburbs, the dangers of inventing - or ignoring - collective identity, and what "home" really means. Not to get ahead of myself, but I think this work is going to be my favorite of anything he's ever done. So while Adam's finishing this fantastic collection, go and peruse his other stuff to satiate your need for good words.
  • Still loving 'Little Children'. I can't tell you how much I loved this movie, far and away my favorite of the year. I'll be cheering heartily for it to win Best Adapted Screenplay at the Oscars. Kate Winslet is her typical brilliantly glorious self, Jackie Earle Haley is a revelation, and the writing is the best I've seen on film in forever. I wish the downtown theater would bring it back in time for the Oscars, but this is ABQ, so I'm not holding my breath. In the meantime, Google "Little Children" for a wealth of goodies, including interviews (don't miss anything featuring director Todd Fields), long think pieces on suburbia and infidelity, and more. Yum yum yum.