Mikaela says:
The following message is from Joe Anderson, owner of the Launchpad and part-owner of the Sunshine Theatre downtown.
A few months ago (my how time passes) our lovely Mayor railed against all-age shows and said, with no evidence, that venues who serve alcohol were threatening our under-age youth. Or some such schlock. There was no real reason for the attack, but the Mayor and his people have moved on it and proposed legislation to end liquor sales at all-age shows. No problem, right? You can forego a little of the wet stuff for a good show? Well, you may be able to, but venues can't. They need your rum-soaked dollar to keep the doors open. 
Do you hate how chain retailers and restaurants take over downtowns with the first whiff of gentrification? Do you love hole-in-the-wall local businesses? Ever wonder how the "creative class" paves the way for "revitalization" that ends up putting money in the hands of local politicians who magically know where to invest at just the right time before things take off? Does that piss you off?
Answer yes to any of these, and Joe's following message is for you. How can you help? Let Joe explain.
(And can I just say again how much I love Joe Anderson? We all owe him a debt of gratitude for literally putting Albuquerque on the map for contemporary music. Most bands passed us by before Joe came on the scene. And yes, I dated him. Best boyfriend ever. Don't get me started about the great dates we went on!)
Hello everyone.
We could use your help if you have some time you could donate. This Friday morning at 9am, the state is holding a hearing regarding the proposed legislation for minors on licensed premises. We need people to been seen and heard.
We hope to persuade the Alcohol and Gaming Division to at least postpone signing this unfair legislation into the regs until further, more in-depth research can be done. If this legislation becomes law (regulation), there would be devastating and possibly irreparable damage done to Albuquerque's steady and growing live music scene.
What you can do:
Show up as early as possible. We will be at Civic Plaza by 7am with 104.7 The Edge. They will be doing their entire morning broadcast from the plaza (tune in for the play-by-play). The hearing begins at 9am at City Council chambers at One Civic Plaza (5th & Marquette, Downtown).
Things you should know:
1. Mayor Martin Chavez hastily made claims months ago that downtown venues with liquor licenses hosting all ages events were a main cause of violence or the perception of violence in the downtown area. Coupled by an attack on downtown cruising, Chavez began his grossly under-researched and over-hyped crusade to put an end to all ages events hosted at these venues. A proposal was written up in the mayor's office and sent up to state. That original proposal was found to be unlawful and unjust, so the state rewrote the proposed legislation.
2. The proposed legislation basically amounts to this: Any venue which generates more than 50% of its gross annual revenue through alcohol sales is strictly prohibited to sell alcohol during all ages events.
FAQs
Q. Can't these venues just do all ages events without the sale of alcohol?
What is the problem?
A. We could, but eventually, we couldn't afford to. What most people do not understand is that we pay for the band's guarantee and our show production / promotion costs from the ticket sales, and pay for in-house expenses using revenue from bar sales. Our entire overhead is quite high. We would eventually lose money and ultimately, either close or open a PF Chang's or Popeye's.
Q. What did you guys do to cause this to happen? Did you anger the mayor?
Is there something crammed in his ass? Did you have too many violations? Are you bad?
A. We have no idea why we are in the middle of this. We've been told by members of the SID (Special Investigations Division), public officials and local organizations that we are NOT a problem venue and that our record is exemplary. I don't even know the mayor. I have no idea what he has in his ass. Since Launchpad opened its doors 8 years ago, the venue has been served 2 administrative fines. One was given on opening week when the staff was caught having beers after hours while they were cleaning. One was issued for serving a minor during an event that was NOT all ages. This happened during a sting set up by the AGD (Alcohol and Gaming Division) several years ago. During the past two and a half years, we have not received a single citation, regardless of what you have heard from the Albuquerque Journal. And we are not bad (I was a boy scout and an altar boy).
Q. What will happen to venues like Journal Pavilion and Isotopes Park?
Don't they get more citations than you?
A. It is very likely that their ticket sales and merchandise/food sales will exempt them from the new legislation. Although it is my strong belief that they would not be interested in operating if they did not have the steady stream of revenue from their $7.00 domestic draft sales. Of course they have more citations than we do. Nineteen citations were written on one day this summer (Megadeth), but I guess that's not a problem. These venues don't even separate their service areas. Sunshine Theater and Launchpad have inner "beer gardens". Young adults cannot even get next to any alcohol. The explanation given from a representative at the Pavilion was that since they are a larger venue, they can't be expected to have the kind of control that the smaller venues have. What? Who hired that dude? What are his job qualifications?
Q. Are there any situations that the mayor has obviously overlooked, Launchpad?
A. Why yes, we believe so. There are about 30 liquor licenses in the downtown area. If we were to remove alcohol and host all ages shows, I am very sure that the over 21 clientele would first meet at a neighboring bar to have a beer or two before coming to the event. Then, in between acts, the over 21 patrons could go back to that neighboring bar for another drink or two. If we've already established that under 21 patrons cannot get alcohol from our bar, what makes this any different, other than the fact that a neighboring bar is
making alcohol revenue off a crowd that my advertised event has brought downtown?
We could use that revenue to pay expenses incurred at our venue.
Q. Doesn't the mayor have a plan to "save the music scene"? He says he has no intention of ending all ages shows. He loves the Ramones!
A. Do you think the mayor is qualified to book bands? The mayor's office is emitting a smoke screen to keep you at bay. If your idea of entertainment is showings of Free Willy at the park, just blow this off. Do we need a fund set up to support music in our state? Yes. Do we need the mayor to mess with the process of free market? No. Isn't he a conservative democrat anyway? Didn't the Ramones play all ages shows in venues which served alcohol? Do you think the Ramones would have liked our mayor?
Q. Are there any unfounded theories that you did not create yourself, but are being passed around by everyone and their moms?
A. That is a crazy way to ask a question, but yes there are. There are rumors out there that the mayor has money invested in the residential buildup of downtown. Property development companies have made liberal donations to his re election campaign. Perhaps the live music venues downtown are considered riff raff in his eyes. Maybe this is step one to commercializing downtown. Who needs Launchpad when you can have Bennigan's? Won't residential properties be worth more without the weirdness?
Q. Is Launchpad about the music?
A. Saying Launchpad is not about music is like saying church is not about religion. I swear on my life that Launchpad is ALL about the music.
Thanks. Please help. This is a serious situation for anyone who loves music.
Joe Anderson
Troop 383
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Call for Help: ABQ Downtown Music Scene Needs You!
Monday, August 22, 2005
Peels of Onion Laughter
Mikaela says:
The genius of the Onion is taking what's deadly serious and making you laugh at it anyway. Such was the case with this "latest headline":
"Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity
With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory"
We haven't really talked about it much on m-pyre, but one of the scariest trends gaining momentum is the recasting of educational science curriculum throughout the country to legitimize the "intelligent design" theory. Not only can evolution not be taught as a "law," some states are requiring that "intelligent design" be given equal airtime in the classroom.
Separation of church and state? Not so much in Kansas.
And it's spreading.
We should be worried.
If something doesn't change soon, it won't be so much survival of the fittest so much as survival of the most vocal and closest to "God."
When people wonder why the left is SO frantic about the creeping influence of the Christian Right into the highest echelons of political power, the sea change in SCIENCE EDUCATION is one. The underlying religious explanation of U.S. support for Israel is another.
Watching a documentary on the First Amendment last night (yes, for fun!) made the connection between the Christian Right and Israeli Jews spookily clear. In order to set the stage for the Second Coming of Christ, the apocalypse to be dreaded by all us sinners and embraced by all those good Christians out there, all Jews (God's Chosen People) must be returned to the Holy Land. Then all but 1,000 of them get wiped out; then Jesus comes. Woo-hoo!
As a fervent leftist, I believe fervently that everyone's faith and ability to worship should be protected by our constitution. This predicates the separation of church and state, which demands that PUBLIC SCHOOL must not be beholden to religious ideology. Evolution is not a religious tenet, much to the contrary of recent rhetoric from the Right. Intelligent Design, despite the new casting in scientific garb, is just the Emperor in no clothes. It must not be paraded around our classrooms as real.
And Israel? I always wondered at the resistance to exploring the situation from the Palestinian perspective. I assumed that the horrors of World War II were enough of an explanation as to our guilt-ridden behaviour. Now? Now I see the importance of exposing our one-sided support of the worst of human dilemmas, when there truly is no one solution, and the best that can be done is to minimize pain in the short-term and maximize benefit to both sides in the future.
And what will that take? A constitutional mantra. Chant with me now: separation of church and state, separation of church and state, separation ...
For more on the evolution/intelligent design debate, see an article from yesterday's NY Times: "Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive."
Note to Eric Griego (and YOU)
Maggie says:
Dear Eric,
So yesterday's Journal shows that you're way behind Mayor Marty, he who would turn our town into one big sprawl wasteland while his cronies reap in the profits. You're WAY behind, Eric. Marty has 40% and you have 13%. Undecided? 30%. Go and get them. Campaign hard and fast, because guess what? There's not much time left, and lots of us are counting on you to get Marty the hell out of office. You're lucky that we despise Marty as much as we do, you know - that's a major uniter of all of us. Plus, your City Council record is a good one, and there's lots going on in this town that could benefit from some progressive leadership. But we're worried, because 13% means there's a long way to go. Are you ready for it?
In other news that I hope lit a fire under your desk chair today, the Journal says that 61% of Albuquerque voters are planning on supporting the minimum wage ballot initiative. 61% is a lot. Pretty shocking, I'm sure, to the Chamber types who thought they could ride out this election with a Marty win and a wage increase defeat without too much sweat or money on their part.
The fact that there's already a clear majority supporting the minimum wage increase is a great sign for you, and I hope you capitalize on it. Those are your voters. Those are that undecided 30%. And the issues need to be made very clear. What's at stake in this election is huge. Do you understand how clearly we see that? So please don't let us down. Please work your ass off. Please, please, please win.
61% are already natural supporters of your candidacy. Make sure they realize that before Election Day, or we're all in trouble.
PS: And to the YOU that this letter was also addressed to, really I mean US. We need to do our part, too. That means volunteering. Marjorie and I had a blast door-knocking for Commissioner Córdova, and are planning on doing the same for Griego. Go to his website and sign up. Because this challenge is one that we need to meet, too.
Jason Kerns: poster boy of tomorrow?
Maggie says:
What a violent week in Albuquerque. For those of you out of town, we had eight murders in the last week - five of them by the same man. John Hyde, who went on a killing spree Friday, was a mentally troubled man with a history of not taking his medication regularly. In one day, he murdered a long-time Department of Transportation worker, a high school student, a new father, and two police officers. Jesus. It reminded me of an officer shooting a couple of years ago, when another mental patient nearly killed a police officer very close to my then-home. Mental health is the big connector for so many crimes here. The lessons seem to scream out from the headlines: when we don't take care of the sick around us, we pay tenfold in the end.
But the crime that keeps coming up for me isn't one from last week. A little over two weeks ago, a Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department helicopter was shot down in a Westside neighborhood. On Friday, Jason Kerns, 29, was indicted on five charges for the shooting that miraculously didn't seriously injure anyone.
If Dickens were writing this drama, Kerns would be the Ghost of Christmas Future. Consider this:
Kerns describes himself as a "trained sniper" from the Marines. He had been stationed in Afghanistan before being honorably discharged in late 2001. After being discharged, he was in and out of vet hospitals with a spinal cord injury, one that still plagues him today. But the kicker? According to his parents, Kerns has suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder since his departure from the Marines.
He's been unable to hold down a job. He's been in and out of hospitals seeking treatment. He lives with his parents. And now: using his sniper training to shoot down a helicopter because it was "annoying" him. Don't get me wrong: Kerns is no hero; what he allegedly did easily could have killed the two men aboard and who knows how many more on the ground. But he may well be a symbol of what's to come.
Right now, the U.S. has some 138,000 troops stationed in Iraq. Suicide rates are at an all-time high. Troop morale is at an all-time low. Reports abound of troops making their own protective gear out of scrap metal because our government won't provide it for them. Families are turning on Bush. We're seeing more anger, less blind mourning.
And at home? Our homeless shelters are full of Vietnam veterans. We see them on street corners every day. A couple of months ago I saw a guy holding a sign on San Mateo saying he was a Gulf War vet. He was twitching and his eyes were completely vacant. He was absolutely haunting. Is he our future?
Compensation to dead soldier's families is shockingly low. And what about the benefits to those who manage to stay alive? Thousands will come home shell-shocked, angry, and lost. We need to be ready for them. We have to realize what's around the corner. We can't be surprised if they lack bravado and a happy face. Suburban moms and shirt-and-tie managers with yellow magnets on their SUVs must have compassion for them, must want to help them, must not look away when they're standing on the corner holding a sign:
"Iraq Vet. Hungry. Homeless."
And those not holding signs? That was Jason Kerns, wasn't it?
A Simple Letter
Mikaela says:
The power of mothers is growing at Camp Casey. If nothing else, their rhetoric is gaining in power of persuasion.
Two mothers walked up to the barriers blocking the entrance to Bush's vacation home in Crawford, Texas. They tried to give the letter to a secret service agent, but he would not accept it. Instead, they dropped it on the ground and covered it in flowers.
They asked the agent to relay a message to the President:
BEATRIZ SALDIVAR: I want to say to President Bush one thing, okay, and in the name of Cindy and all the mothers, that letter that's laying there with those precious flowers on top is laying there. Our soldiers when they killed -- get killed in Iraq, the men next to them, the other fellow soldiers, picks up their body, their pieces. Sometimes the bodies are not recognized. Sometimes they come back in one piece, and sometimes they have their eyes open and they're dead. We ask you, President, to have the courage to pick up that letter. It’s just a simple letter. We cannot pick up our sons and daughters and husbands and nephews, but you can -- we cannot bring them back alive, but you can have the courage to pick up that letter and talk to this nation and the world. The whole world is listening.
A complete transcript can be found at Democracy Now.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Conscience check-in
Maggie says:
How very interesting. According to CNN, a top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell calls Powell's presentation to the UN regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq "the lowest point" of his life.
"I wish I had not been involved in it," says Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, a longtime Powell adviser who served as his chief of staff from 2002 through 2005. "I look back on it, and I still say it was the lowest point in my life."According to the article, Powell walked into Wilkerson's office and handed him a stack of papers from the White House, saying "This is what I've got to present at the United Nations according to the White House, and you need to look at it." Wilkerson recalls "It was anything but an intelligence document. It was, as some people characterized it later, sort of a Chinese menu from which you could pick and choose."
Wilkerson goes on to describe the breakdown between Powell and then-CIA director George Tenet after much of the "Chinese menu" was found to be fabricated.
The Wilkerson interview was leaked from an upcoming CNN documentary called "Dead Wrong -- Inside an Intelligence Meltdown." According to CNN, the documentary "will piece together the events leading up to the mistaken WMD intelligence that was presented to the public. A presidential commission that investigated the pre-war WMD intelligence found much of it to be 'dead wrong.'"
Wish I had cable for that one. I also wish I could see a window into Colin Powell's conscience.
Just ahead: more planning nightmares!!!
Maggie says:
Take a look at the first paragraph of this Journal article from today and see if something (okay, two things) make you cringe:
"New City in Works Near Rio Rancho"Cringe #1: "Phoenix-area developer." You know, since Phoenix (pictured above) is such a nice place to live and all, without sprawl or water issues or infrastructure problems and with so much local character, local economic development, and sustainable development... Perfect! A Phoenix-area developer sounds like just the thing for the Albuquerque area!
A Phoenix-area developer wants to build a community of more than 70,000 people about 10 miles west of Rio Rancho in Sandoval County.
Cringe #2: "more than 70,000 people." 70,000 people! Someone fill me in with exact numbers here, but with the thousands upon thousands of people expected with Mesa del Sol and now the Zacate development, plus this one, we're talking huge change to this area, one that is already over-burdened with rapid growth and improper planning and infrastructure development. And by the way, where in the world is the water for all these people going to come from?
Call me a crazy anti-capitalist, but will a time ever come when people will stop looking for ways to make moneymoneymoneymoneymoney through ill-conceived new developments and just focus on what we have? Because there is lots of work already here that needs to be done - there are neighborhoods needing investment, places that should be more livable than they are, and how about some local jobs for all those West-siders who are surrounded only by homes just like theirs and big box stores with chain restaurants attached? The Westside and Rio Rancho are just a nightmare. And so we have a few developers who can still profit from developing more nightmares and regional leadership that's beholden to them, but we are all losing.
So get ready, locals: hang on to your homes and favorite spots in downtown, Nob Hill, the South Valley, the North Valley, and the East Mountains. Every place around you is going to start looking more and more like Phoenix. And when everyone realizes what's been lost, guess whose neighborhoods they're going to come after because of their character and uniqueness? That's right: yours.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Celebrate 25 years with SWOP!
The SouthWest Organizing Project:
25 Years of Empowering Disenfranchised Communities and Fighting Injustice!
Party of the Millenium
Quetzal
The B-Side Players
Friday, September 9
8:00pm ‘til we shut it down
in the
El Rey Theater and Golden West Saloon
7th & Central – Downtown
Tickets
$15 in advance
$20 at the door
Gets you into both venues
SW Organizing Project • 211 10th SW • 247-8832 UNM Centro de la Raza • UNM Campus • 277-5020 Burning Paradise • 800 Central SW • 244-1161 Natural Sound • 3422 Central SE in Nob Hill • 255-8295 Bookworks •
In
Candyman •
Sponsored by:
SouthWest Organizing Project
Raices Collective of KUNM
Ceiba Productions Southwest
KUNM 89.9 FM
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
Side by Side
Mikaela says:
So it appears that our newspapers' reticence to show any actual violence or pain extends beyond Iraq to other hot spots in the world. Most notably today: Israel, where settlers and soldiers are locked in struggle over the remaining moments of occupation of the Gaza Strip.
This from today's Washington Post:
The headline: Hundreds of Settlers Evacuated From Gaza
Police and soldiers slowly but methodically begin removing settlers in emotionally charged scenes played out in homes and streets in Gaza Strip.
The photo:
"It becomes an extension of you. It's like a window to your soul," says Jason Berkowitz of his iPod. (Lucian Perkins/Post) The iPod Love Story
To iPodders, the irresistible, indispensable, irreplaceable iPod is a personal memory bank.
– Jose Antonio Vargas
The missing quote:
"Nope, there's nothing wrong with the culture of consumption in the U.S. Oblivious to the world's problems? How can you say that? The bands I listen to are totally political. "
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
Poetry in pictures
Maggie says:
I know, maybe you out-of-towners are saying, "What in the world? Has m-pyre been completely sucked in by poetry? Isn't that more an m-pyrical topic?" Well, yes and no. That's kind of our point. Albuquerque was overtaken with this incredible spirit of change last week - Pika summed it up beautifully here - and now we're full of restlessness wanting to harness all that energy and excitement. But maybe our words haven't captured how moving the week was - how it actually was all about movement. Maybe these photos (all from this LostWays Gallery) can help explain.
The Providence team in Robinson Park. This team was really powerful. So is their message.
Every venue looked like this inside - it was amazing!
And downtown looked like THIS.
I love this picture - it captures so much of what last week was about. 
More action on the streets. They were ALIVE with energy!
Saving "political capital"
Mikaela says:
I haven’t been this angry in a long time. It’s been at least a week!
What are Democrats thinking? What are they fucking waiting for? If now is not the time to fight for our country, when is, exactly? Does Bush have to actually come out and ANNOUNCE that he’s a fascist religious fanatic who aims to deny the freedoms this country is based on? Isn’t it enough that he has strategically done everything in his considerable power to make that happen???
Okay, here’s what I’m talking about.
This news from Democracy Now (thank the liberal/lefty god for Democracy Now):
Papers Show John Roberts to be "Forceful Conservative"
More papers have been released from Supreme Court nominee John Roberts days working in the Reagan White House. The Wall Street Journal reports the papers depict him as a "forceful conservative." In one paper, Roberts wrote that a controversial memorial service for aborted fetuses was "an entirely appropriate means of calling attention to the abortion tragedy." He also approved a telegram written by President Reagan that compared Roe vs. Wade to the Dred Scott decision of 1857, which upheld slavery. In another paper, Roberts defended prayer in public schools.
And then THIS news from the Washington Post: (all added emphases my personal outrage & edited for space)
Roberts Unlikely To Face Big Fight
Many Democrats See Battle as Futile
By Mike Allen and Dana Milbank
Tuesday, August 16, 2005; A01
Democrats have decided that unless there is an unexpected development in the weeks ahead, they will not launch a major fight to block the Supreme Court nomination of John G. Roberts Jr.
(!!!!)
Democratic senators and aides who are intimately involved in deliberations about strategy said that they see no evidence that most Democratic senators are prepared to expend political capital in what is widely seen as a futile effort to derail the nomination.
Although they expect to subject President Bush's nominee to tough questioning at confirmation hearings next month (woopdedoo), members of the minority party said they do not plan to marshal any concerted campaign against Roberts because they have concluded that he is likely to get at least 70 votes -- enough to overrule parliamentary tactics such as a filibuster that could block the nominee.
"No one's planning all-out warfare," said a Senate Democratic aide closely involved in caucus strategy on Roberts. For now, the aide said, Democratic strategy is to make it clear Roberts is subject to fair scrutiny while avoiding a pointless conflagration that could backfire on the party. "We're going to come out of this looking dignified and will show we took the constitutional process seriously," the aide said. (Seriously but not bravely.)
…
The Democrats' decision to hold their fire -- less a formal strategy than an emerging consensus -- has allowed conservatives to husband their resources for future battles. (Dems waiting for all out dissolution of Congress, I guess.) Progress for America, a political group working closely with the White House, had planned to spend $18 million to promote the confirmation of Roberts but now may spend less than half that, according to Republican aides. (Why they thought it would cost that much to defeat a playing-dead party, I don't know.)
Democrats said that instead of mounting a headlong assault on Roberts, they plan to use the hearings and the surrounding attention by the news media to remind voters of their party's values, including the protection of rights for individual Americans. (Values like, never fight for what you believe -- especially when the price is high and the cost is higher.) The plan calls for emphasizing rights beyond abortion in an effort to appeal to a broader swath of the electorate. (You know, the broader swath that's going to vote for them against Bush because the Democrats stand behind everything Bush does.)
…
Without question, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee will subject Roberts to intense grilling -- and the discovery of new and damaging information about Roberts could dramatically change the strategy. (I'm sure he's shaking in his boots. "Questioning? But, but ... I'm a lawyer! Wait a minute, I'm a lawyer! Ask me any goddamn question you want!") But for now, Democratic lawmakers say they are less interested in opposing Roberts than in serving notice to Bush that they would react very differently if a more overtly conservative choice were made for a future Supreme Court vacancy. (They gotta stop serving those notices! Get a runner to do it. Servants will never be masters. Bush knows that!)
Democrats say they do not dispute that the selection of Roberts did not present them with obvious ammunition against the White House. (Can you believe this shit? Corporate sell out, prayer in schools, individual rights? Nope, nothin!)
"There were some potential candidates with a record of hostility to fundamental rights who would have been opposed flat out by a majority of the Democratic caucus from Day One. Judge Roberts was not on that list," said Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.). "It doesn't mean he's getting a free pass. ("Hey, Tom, check this list. This guy sounds awful! No? You sure? Check again? Not even toward the bottom? Okay, guess he's alright then. Go ahead, fella. Step to the front of the line. Would you like a cocktail while you're waiting?")
"There's nothing the White House would rather have seen than having us come out reflexively swinging at a nominee in order to accuse us of politicizing the debate," Manley added. "There was a strategic decision to keep our powder dry, to reserve judgment until the committee does its work. We want Democrats to be able to fight on principles, not politics." (Okay now wait a minute... Aren't politics ABOUT principles? Have they forgotten even THAT? Do they remember that we WANT them to fight for politics because we CHOOSE our politics based on, oh, I don't know PRINCIPLES????)
The Democratic consensus not to mount a major fight comes in part from a calculation that the party would be in a stronger position to oppose a future -- and perhaps more clearly conservative -- nominee if it did not mount a full-scale and likely fruitless assault on Roberts. (Who calculates this shit, and can we buy them a new slide rule? Seriously. Since when did sitting on the bench every goddamn minute of every game help to win anything? Haven't they watched any good underdog movies this summer? Bad News Bears? Anything? No memory of how people rally around the people fighting hardest for what's about to be lost? No? Okay, well. That's cool. Whatever. Rest up, fellas. I'm sure there's something you can do NEXT fascist presidency.)
…
No Democrat has announced opposition to Roberts. The toughest remarks so far were by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) last week at the Golden Gate University School of Law in San Francisco, where she said she must know whether Roberts would support abortion rights and privacy. "If I don't believe he will, I won't vote for him," Boxer said. "I can use all the parliamentary rules I have as a senator to stand up and fight for you." (Alone. Did I mention fight for you ALONE?)
Some Democrats would like to see more of a fight. Lanny Davis, a former Clinton legal aide and party official, complained that Democrats are avoiding a showdown with Roberts over ideology by fighting over whether documents will be released from Roberts's time in government. "If they wanted to have a fight on substance they wouldn't be talking about process," Davis said. Democrats, he said, have "either folded or procrastinated to the point where it [opposition] won't have any effect." (Yeah. Understatement. Fuck an A.)
Poets Passing
Thanks to everyone for all the support during the National Poetry Slam.
We did it! We really did it! This was far and away the biggest event I've ever been involved with. Days and days long. And loooooooooonnnnnnnnggggg days. Anyone can tell you, especially my poor dog -- who actually barked at me coming home one night. She's never done THAT before...
Here's my partner in crime, Hilary Lipton, Volunteer Visionary. I was the grunt; she was the power. It's true! It's true!
The poets had an amazing time. They loved Albuquerque, and they could really feel all the community support that just grew and grew over the course of the week.
We started with very little press coverage -- Alibi withstanding -- and eventually hit every media outlet that heard the buzz. The Jurinal wasn't even going to cover it at all until we got so many people out Wednesday night. Wednesday night! Poetry!
The owner of OPM now wants to host a poetry slam once a month. The owners of Flying Star LOVED how many people now know where they are downtown. We kept Gorilla Tango in the black for another month at least.
All in all, this poetry event gave back to Albuquerque as much as it took. Mostly what it took is every single ounce of my energy and shred of free time! Everyone else's, too, for that matter.
And the poetry itself? Well, what I got to hear of it was ... incredible. Best of the best of the best. I loved hearing how many people had never seen performance poetry before who were just BLOWN away. They're hooked. They kept asking, "Do we have this kind of talent here in Albuquerque?" And then our boys proved that we do by WINNING the entire thing.
Little ole Albuquerque beat out every single other city for ... poetry. Despite the hoopla at finals night, what was clear during the competition was how tight our team was. We may not have been the best writers (although we were among the best for sure), but we had the best team. I think that's what the audience really responded to. And the fact that they performed on their home turf? Probably helped, but it could just as easily have hurt them, as there were plenty of judges that did NOT want to see them win.
So... it's anyone's guess, really.
For me, I was just overwhelmed again and again with the energy and passion sweeping downtown -- from the poets, the audience, and also the volunteers, who poured sweat and guts into everything they did.
I loved the feeling of solidarity, knowing we were all working together to make this impossible thing happen.
The most tense moment for me was standing outside of the El Rey before individual semi-finals. We'd already turned 100 people away from NHCC; all the venues were sold out. We could easily see 1200 people show up any minute trying to get into an 800 person venue. We were looking at trying to control 400 disappointed/angry people on the sidewalk.
I walked up to 2 guys that I've met through friends -- friends of friends, if you will -- and told them I was nervous and asked them to help in whatever way they could just to keep things calm. Damned if they didn't end up working the door ALL NIGHT. That's solidarity. They got my back, and they didn't really know me from Eve.
Community, man. I swear to god.
Monday, August 15, 2005
More on Sheehan
Maggie says:
Last week I wrote about Cindy Sheehan, a story getting lots of press now, much to my delight. Here's a follow-up.
In response to Sheehan's presence outside of his Crawford ranch, Bush recently noted:
"...Whether it be here or in Washington or anywhere else, there's somebody who has got something to say to the president, that's part of the job," Bush said on the ranch. "And I think it's important for me to be thoughtful and sensitive to those who have got something to say."Can you imagine a less sensitive statement? To a woman mourning her son who was killed as a direct result of his decisions, Bush wishes she would just go away so he can get on with his life? What about her son not being able to get on with his life? What about Cindy Sheehan trying to get on with her life in a meaningful way, one that Bush refuses to acknowledge?
"But," he added, "I think it's also important for me to go on with my life, to keep a balanced life."
What happened to a real understanding of loss of life and what that means? What happened to personal responsibility? What happened to decency? This man makes me so ashamed.
Sunday, August 14, 2005
Welcome to the world, Diego
And while we were consumed by the poetry slams, another momentous event was happening over at University Hospital.
The M-Pyre gals say WELCOME TO THE WORLD to little Diego Bejar.
Jo Ann and Fernando --- we love you and could not be happier for you!
Friday, August 12, 2005
Feeling alive at the NPS
Maggie says:
I've been reeling the past two days. Working at the Flying Star, watching these amazing poets, and feeling... hope. The past two nights have been exactly what I needed. There I was, feeling dejected, hopeless, depressed, angry, and alone. And flooding into Albuquerque come 500+ slam poets, teams from all over the country (and a few outside of it), and with them they bring beautiful words and passion and protest and insight and genius and change.
I watch these amazing men and women and feel my gut quench and my heart pound. Their words reach me. In three minutes, they can perfectly capture my deep unhappiness with the war, my outrage at the Bush administration, my regret that American life can seem so empty. And then there's the promise: that none of us who feel this way are alone, that there are more of us than we sometimes think, that we are the future, that there's still promise and opportunity and the hope for something better, for something more. That hope is very much alive in Albuquerque this week. The venues are bursting with it; the streets are electric with it. All over town, there's hope for something kinder and more humane. And Albuquerque has never been a better host.
My favorite moments so far:
- Hugging the Durham, NC team after their win and being happily enveloped by several giant Southern black men who sounded just like home, and who greeted me as if I'd never left
- Nearly crying after a woman's reflection on her abortion that kept going back to "I'm not ashamed and I don't regret it, but sometimes I get lonely"
- The last group piece by the Hawaiian team, where three native Hawaiians kept shouting "The Americans are coming" and listed off place after place where we've turned "people of color into the minority," including their own homeland
- Hearing a storm poet's tribute to his lesbian daughter who tried to commit suicide, which ends with a raging declaration of why parents should love their children unconditionally
- The Minneapolis group piece last night called "Nerds are Sexy" - I think we all felt like it was written just for us :-)
- Every poem that's railed against our corporate consumer culture
- At the Erotic Poetry Slam, this piece called "Reflex" by this amazingly beautiful woman who also noted, "In three years, I've never gotten laid at the Nationals. Help me out here!"
- Poem after poem after poem that's received deafening applause with every attack against current U.S. policy and a call for something better
- The collective spirit and energy in Flying Star - it's been PACKED! (people lining the staircase, sitting on dividers, poking out of every corner)
- How everyone gave us funny looks last night when those of who live here got really excited when it started raining ("Do you smell that?!?!?")
- Mikaela and I holding each other up from laughing so hard at Erotic night during what has to be the worst, most un-erotic poem ever performed, delivered in all its tank top/white sneaker glory from a Corpus Christi man who is just not very gifted, to put it nicely ("Mikaela, he did not just say that, did he?")
- My sidekick Genny at the FS merchandise/ticketing table, who is the coolest 16-year old I've ever met
I'll be back at Flying Star tonight working the semi-finals. In case any of you locals haven't been to an event yet, this is your night to go! All the teams have been whittled down to just twenty. Of the teams I've seen, I'd recommend checking out the Mesa team's hilarious group piece making fun of Nascar culture and everything the Hawaii team performs. I also heard that Charlotte (yay NC!) and Hollywood kicked ass at the Launchpad this week. And of course, I wish the ABQ team tons of luck.
Tonight's schedule:
| VENUE | LAUNCHPAD | GOLDEN WEST | NHCC | FLYING STAR |
| TIMES | HEAD 2 HEAD HAIKUSHOWCASE AT 8:00 TEAM SEMI AT 9:00 | GROUP PIECESHOWCASE AT 8:00 TEAM SEMI AT 9:00 | NO SHOWCASE TEAM SEMI AT 8:30 | GROUP PIECE SHOWCASE AT 8:00 TEAM SEMI AT 9:00 |
| TEAMS | Ft Worth | San Francisco | NYC Louder Arts | Boston Lizard Lounge |
| Palo Alto | Charlotte | Hawaii | Seattle | |
| Berkeley | Detroit | Albuquerque | Baton Rouge | |
| Mesa | DC- Baltimore | Oakland | Hollywood | |
| NYC- Urbana | Minneapolis | Delray | LA Green |
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
Moveon to Rove
Moveon.org, bless their little liberal hearts, sponsored a slogan contest (which I did not hear about until after!!) to fire Karl Rove.
At least someone's still working on this front, even if it's just with humor. We all know that sometimes humor is the best expression of righteous anger.
And the winner is ...
Other honorable mentions include:
Karl Rove: The Voice of Treason
Support Homeland Security—Fire Karl Rove
It's not Left or Right—it's WRONG. Fire Karl Rove
Bush Knew: Fire Him Too
Fire Rove. It's not just a good idea, it's the law.
And one favorite plays off of Karl Rove's defense that he didn't use Valerie Plame's name—he only called her "Joe Wilson's wife."
That slogan is: "Fire Mrs. Rove's Husband."
Public goods and the "free" market
Hi folks: I’m a guest over at SWOPblogger today, with the following commentary.
“This is a major step forward in an effort to mechanize chile production. We saw the need for this machine, developed the technology, tested it and then handed it to a commercial manufacturer.”
Monday, August 08, 2005
Mourning mom in vigil
Maggie says:
While our esteemed president continues his self-indulgent five-week vacation in dusty Crawford, Texas (otherwise known as an attempt to avoid the messiness of his day job), Cindy Sheehan is demanding that he wake up and pay attention.
How's she doing it? The California woman, whose son Casey was killed in Baghdad in April, is waiting in vigil outside the Crawford ranch until she is allowed to speak with Bush.
Some perspective: 1,829 American troops, including 31 just this month, who have died in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003. And while Bush routinely talks about these deaths as being "made in a noble cause," he's not very noble when dealing with familes who are angry and full of questions, as opposed to families who are just quiet and sad.
"I want to ask the president, why did he kill my son?" Sheehan told reporters. "He said my son died in a noble cause, and I want to ask him what that noble cause is."
Fair question. Sheehan is a founder of Gold Star Families for Peace, a group committed to bringing American troops home. Their website asks: "Just because our children are dead, why would we want any more families to suffer the same pain and devastation?"
Even some Republicans are favoring Sheehan and her vigil, saying that the decent thing for Bush to do would be to meet with her. But then, we already know that Bush is not a very decent man.
Sheehan will continue her vigil outside the ranch through August. With temperatures in the three-digit range and politicians noting echoes of Vietnam in Sheehan's quest for accountability, we can only wish her all the best.
And as for what's "noble?" Cindy Sheehan is noble. Sadly, this war is not.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
National Poetry Slam in ABQ
Maggie says:
So in case any of you haven't noticed the signs all over town (and in case you don't regularly check out our lighter-side blog m-pyrical, where Mikaela has been talking it up), the National Poetry Slam is coming to Albuquerque THIS WEEK!
Why should this interest you?
1) If you're an m-pyre fan, you already know that Mikaela is quite the poet. In fact, Mikaela is one of the Volunteer Coordinators at this year's slam and has been working her ass off to make this happen. She's so good at what she does that she finagled Marjorie and I into volunteering at the Slam, which brings me to the next point...
2) This is your chance to see M3 in action all week. I'll be the Venue Manager at the Flying Star Downtown on Wed, Thurs, and Fri nights, where poets will compete from 7-11 p.m. Marjorie will be the Venue Manager at the National Flamenco Institute on Wed and Thurs from 7-11 p.m. and will also be working the finals on Saturday night. And Mikaela (bless her heart) will be running all over the place, so chances are you'll see her pretty much wherever you go.
3) If you don't know much about poetry slams (Marjorie and I are definitely slam virgins, so you're not alone), then this is your chance to get into it. The Alibi did a great write-up of what to expect, so check it out to get pumped.
Please attend! The schedule is on the NPS website, the events are cheap, the finals should be full of drama and excitement (I have to miss them to drive to Arkansas... grrrrr....) and who knows what crazy things you'll see downtown. Really, there is not a single reason to miss this week full of events. And just think of how happy you'll make Mikaela (not to mention all the other hard-working organizers who deserve tons of credit) if there's great turnout.
So go. Just do it. We'll see you there.
CAFTA fallout (finally!)
Maggie says:
From David Sirota (of course), here's news of fallout for the Dems who sold out progressive values and voted for CAFTA:
Immediately after the vote on the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi held an emergency meeting with her caucus to discuss consequences for the 15 Democrats who each cast the deciding vote for the trade pact. Though no decision out of that meeting has been made public, powerful on-the-ground forces in some Democrats' districts are demanding that she follow up her call for accountability with action.This is GREAT. Folks at home paying attention, demanding accountability, and demanding retribution for terrible votes. This is exactly what could lead to unity, to a collective opposition, and to a much-needed return to respectability for the Democratic party.
Specifically, a powerful coalition of unions and grassroots advocacy organizations in New York today have sent a letter to Pelosi asking her to remove Reps. Greg Meeks (D-NY) and Ed Towns (D-NY) from their positions on the Financial Services and Commerce Committees, respectively. Consider how big a deal this really is: powerful local forces are asking the House Democratic leader to take away power from their local lawmakers, because their local lawmakers aren't representing them.
Also, Sirota reports that labor is looking to throw the turncoat Dems out of office.
The Los Angeles Times reports that organized labor is ramping up its efforts to unseat House members who sold out their constituents and voted for the Central American Free Trade Agreement. In their sights already are two Democrats on my earlier list of those who are consistently selling out their party, Reps. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) and Greg Meeks (D-NY). And on the GOP side, Rep. Robin Hayes (R-NC) is flailing around trying to avoid what should be a serious challenge in 2006.Again: FINALLY. For far too long the Democratic party has looked the other way when its members have acted against the party's interests (Lieberman alert!). And again, no matter what happens in the end, the fact that this type of organizing is happening is nothing but positive for the future of the party.
My note to Dems: Unity. Opposition. Standing up for something. The party can be all these things. But not until real organizing starts, not until retribution begins for the sell-outs. The message to the turncoats should be: we don't have the time or room for you anymore - stand with the party or we'll push you out, end of story. (Hey, NM: this means Bingaman, you know.)
Friday, August 05, 2005
Atom Bombs
Here is what the
Three days later we dropped another one on
At least 100,000 civilian residents were killed in that attack.
The destruction of that many people in one moment is hard to comprehend.
Many argue that by dropping the bomb we showed how deadly it was, thereby preventing an ultimately greater number of deaths through ongoing warfare. I can't help but think this notion is wishful thinking, a way to save ourselves from the ramifications of what we did. Regardless, I don’t think anyone can dispute the inhumanity of dropping a nuclear bomb on a densely populated civilian center. If we wanted to show that we had it, why couldn’t it have been dropped in a rural area? Likewise, if it was for the purpose of showing the Japanese they were in for complete destruction, wouldn’t just the one bombing do well enough? Why
Rove can't escape Democracy Now
Mikaela says:
Great interview yesterday on Democracy Now with former Ambassador Joseph Wilson (of Valerie Plame fame) and a reporter who exposed more of Rove's foibles.
JOSEPH WILSON: Judy Miller is in jail for civil contempt of court. And for me, what that means is that somebody sitting very close to the President of the United States, who despite the President's very direct order that he or she cooperate fully with the Justice Department, has decided not to step forward, but to be a coward and hide behind Judy Miller's willingness to protect the confidentiality of the sources rather than step forward and accept responsibility for what he or she said to her, said to Judy. That's why she is in jail, because somebody in the White House is disobeying the President of the United States and is too much a coward to step forward and accept responsibility for what he or she said.
On the recess appointment of John Bolton to the U.N.:
JOSEPH WILSON: I think it was unfortunate that Mr. Bolton was appointed in a recess appointment. I don't think that gives him a lot of credibility either at the United Nations or within U.S. government circles. Dick Holbrook was offered a recess appointment in the Clinton administration and refused it, saying that he needed to have the support of the Congress in order to be able to do his job up there. I think, more fundamentally, it's pretty clear to me that the ethical standards demanded of senior public servants by this administration are very low indeed. The fact that Mr. Rove, who is now documented to have been a liar and to have been the source of a treasonous leak is still on the payroll and Mr. Libby is still on the payroll and Mr. Bolton is up at the United Nations really, I think, is a breach of the President's bond to the American people that his -- he was good for his word and that he was honest and he was a straight shooter.
Murray Waas has reported on a specific strategic effort by the White House to sell the Iraq war to Congress, the media, the American people: a working group called the White House Iraq Group, known by its acronym, WHIG, which Scooter Libby headed up with help from Karl Rove. When Joseph Wilson wrote his NY Times Op-Ed outing the White House lies from their campaign, they developed strategies to take Wilson down. His wife was the silver bullet.
MURRAY WAAS: [T]here was a very concerted campaign. It wasn't just casual conversations, or officials like Rove were talking to reporters about other things, and this issue just came up, that they actually had meetings and strategies and so forth about it.
...
JUAN GONZALEZ: The role of the press in this whole issue, because clearly, because of the attempts of the White House to leak the information on Valerie Plame to a whole number of folks in the press, this is a story that many reporters in Washington know more about than they're actually reporting.
MURRAY WAAS: That's correct. Our hands are tied.
8,000 and the hits keep on coming
Mikaela says:
m-pyre's about to hit 8,000.
What I want to know is this: WHO ARE ALL YOU PEOPLE?
And why don't you write?
Were you waiting for an invitation? Well, here it is. And it's golden.
This is a post about our readers. Introduce yourselves. For those of you who leave us comments, thank you, and welcome back.
For all you stealth readers: pony up.
Say hello.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
Quote of the Week: John Roberts on "activist judges"
Mikaela says:
Asked about his position on "activist judges," here is Supreme Court Justice nominee's response:
"Judges must be constantly aware that their role, while important, is limited," Judge John Roberts wrote. "They do not have a commission to solve society's problems, as they see them, but simply to decide cases before them according to the rule of law."
I'm sorry. Solve society's problems? Isn't that what JUSTICE is about? He's just disqualified himself, in my book, not that I thought he was qualified in the first place...
Law exists in the realm of potentialities to protect those with power from abusing those without. In my reading, activist judges are well within the law. Roberts, on the other hand, is waffling on a dangerous fencepost.
Sorry Everybody
Mikaela says:
In light of recent events, knowing how much we love and appreciate our President, I thought I'd let everyone know that the fantastic website www.sorryeverybody.com, which solicited and published photos from everyday people apologizing to the world when Bush got elected, has compiled them into a book and will soon come out the companion version of apologies accepted.
These were my favorites.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Bolting from Bolton
Mikaela says:
In answer to Marjorie's post below, the next best latest and greatest story is Bolton. I just love how they keep us running from fire to fire, each bigger than the last, the others forgotten even as they burn our asses off.
Barbara Boxer is the best at generating "click here" protests and outrage. I've had a ball tailoring my own responses to whoever she decides needs a deluge of form letters.
Here's the Bolton memo to Bush with my own additions in italics:
President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Subject: I protest your appointment of John Bolton
Dear President Bush:
I strongly object to your recess appointment of John Bolton. And I heartily object to your single-handed abuse of power and blantant disregard for democracy.
If it was so important to get an ambassador to the U.N., why not pick a less controversial figure that the Senate could actually condone?
To send such an individual as controversial as John Bolton to be our representative to the world will only undermine our efforts to win friends and allies at this critical time.
It also shows true hypocrisy to choose someone by fiat to play the part of a "representative" of our nation. How can he represent America when he was only sent by you? He can only ever represent your interests, but ... I guess you knew that. Must be what you intended in the first place. Thanks a lot. I guess the American people will need to find our own representative to send.
Your Administration stonewalled the Senate when it requested critical documents to shed light on Bolton's activities at the State Department.
Further, John Bolton did not tell the truth in a statement to the Senate that he swore was truthful -- relating to being questioned by the Inspector General in his investigation into false claims that Iraq attempted to buy yellow cake uranium from Niger.
Can't your Administration ever admit it made a mistake?
This continued effort to put politics ahead of the national interest will not be forgotten by the American people. We can only hope YOU will.
Sincerely,
Mikaela Renz
Monday, August 01, 2005
In absentia
Maggie says:
Sometimes M3 gets a little tired. At least, this M does. Politics are so depressing right now. I feel lackluster, lifeless, spent. Look at what's around us: CAFTA. Crappy energy bill. John Roberts. And today: John Bolton and his ridiculous recess appointment (why does this exist except to thwart standard operating procedure/democratic checks and balances in Washington?).
So anyway, it's too much for me right now. I can't deal. But luckily, David Sirota is dealing for me. So anyone logging on hoping to find some political analysis or biting commentary, see SirotaBlog instead. He's on top of it.
Monday, July 25, 2005
News Peels from The Onion
Marine Corps Shortens Slogan To 'The Few'
WASHINGTON, DC—In light of recruiting shortfalls, a near standstill in re-enlistment, and rock-bottom troop morale, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Michael Hagee announced Monday that the Marines will alter their unofficial slogan, abbreviating it to the more accurate "The Few." Hagee said, "We are still the Marines, the premier combat arm of the U.S. military." The Marines will also change their motto to Semper Fidelis, Sic Non Sapienti, or "Always Faithful, But This Is Just Ridiculous."
News in Brief: "Bush Awaits Orders From Rove On Handling Of Rove Scandal"
From Center for American Progress: Now you see him...
Now you don't. Isn't the media great??
Re-Organized Labor
Mikaela says:
News of a shakeup in the AFL-CIO, largest of U.S. unions, has me wondering whether we should be rooting for a complete makeover, not just of trade unions, but also of the Democratic party, which the unions used to help define. These days, the relationship is not so clear, with unions in general in decline and the Democratic party sharing a bed with Republicans in the corporate suite.
At this point, maybe any change is good, and our best hope could be a new way to look at both bedrock institutions. Maybe the time for upset and progress is finally here, and after the initial birth pangs and tearing, they will emerge as leadership institutions once again. Lord knows we need it.
Despite the fear of the unknown, I have to embrace the energy that is rising toward a reform that we can only hope signals a new surge of strength in organized labor. And if labor is strong, can a strong Democratic Party* be far behind? Here's hoping.
* See also some great recent posts by m-pyre's favorite blogger, Arvin Hill, explaining why we can't rely on current Democratic leaders to get it on their own. If new union leadership emerges, we have to corral it to set the direction for the Party immediately, since we're bankrupt as it is.
Friday, July 22, 2005
Raging Grannies indeed
Maggie says:
M-pyre's beloved Raging Grannies have extra significance today.
According to CNN, "'Raging Grannies' want to enlist, go to Iraq." Now I don't think these Raging Grannies are the same ones as our mascots, but how cool are these women?!?!
"A group of anti-war senior citizens calling themselves the 'Tucson Ranging Grannies' say they want to enlist in the U.S. Army and go to Iraq so that their children and grandchildren can come home." Five of the women are facing trespassing charges for trying to enlist at a local recruitment office. Raging Granny Betty Schroeder, 74, complained that "...they wouldn't even speak to us... they just called the police."
I'd like the Raging Grannies to know that their message is being heard loud and clear. Especially by us hopeful Raging Grannies. Rock on, ladies!
Syncretic Love
"Jardin Perfumado/Perfumed Garden," Mary Antonia Wood , 2004. Someone else’s heart
rests on his stony belly.
In a perpetual sit-up
he has the rock-hard abs of a movie star
or maybe he’s the hermaphrodite
birth-crunching the orchid
that falls into modern hands.
He births twins, actually:
one orchid
one orchid-blooming heart.
The proud Mayan abuelos
lean into the border.
Their love has breasted
the Aztec generation.
From this flowering of culture
we have distilled
the closed-eye passion
and Puritanism of modern love
Clark gabling her neck
her hair falling back in one heavy curl
while on the other side of the world, through time,
green Egyptian men crunch pyramids
and joy passes between continents
like perfume propogates itself
riding
in elevators.
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Virgin politics in Uganda
Maggie says:
This is absolutely outrageous. New legislation in Uganda would provide girls with full scholarships for college on one condition: that they're virgins. In order to have their tuition paid for by the Ugandan government, prospective girls would submit to a gynecological exam to "prove" their virginity and therefore advance their education.
The sponsor of this $#%&*, Sulaiman Madada, says that this approach is forward-thinking and progressive for two reasons: 1) boys aren't included in the program, meaning this is a pro-female educational initiative, and 2) the government is creatively tackling the massive problem of HIV infection among Ugandans.
To respond to both points:
1) To promote female education, promote it. Don't tie it to virginity and pretend that the reason boys aren't in this program is because you really want more girls in college. Nope - the real focus here is keeping Ugandan girls "chaste" for Ugandan boys, who are clearly not expected to abstain from much of anything. And what happens to the smart, ambitious girls who are not virgins after high school? Why are they any less worthy of college than someone else?
2) To tackle the problem of HIV and AIDS, tackle it. We all know that safe sex is a better way to do that abstinence-only programming, but if that were the approach then girls would be "allowed" to have sex, right? Uganda can't have girls having smart sex with condoms, so instead they're tying their "have sex and die" approach with a big college tuition ribbon around it and pretending it's about education.
I see this initiative as further proof that globally we are seeing wrong-headed approaches to policies that affect both men and women, yet are geared toward females for reasons that have very much to do with stereotypes of chastity and very little to do with the real world.
So how about it, Ugandan girls: Remain a virgin and go to college for free! (Just don't be expected to be treated on par with men, or for that matter, whole human beings.)
Roberts for Injustice
Mikaela says:
Another stealth job by the White House has put forward Judge Roberts as nominee for Supreme Court Justice to replace Sandra Day O'Connor.
The White House said it was looking at women candidates. It says it was looking at minority candidates. It said its pool of nominees "reflected" America.
It said the nominee would be chosen quickly. It said the nomination would be postponed to give as little time for grilling as possible. It said next week. It said today.
And then last night, it said this white man from Harvard, whose background is defending corporations and opposing Roe v. Wade, with so little experience (2 years in the federal courts=low profile and short paper trail) that it will be difficult to judge him based on his record.
It said the timing of this announcement had nothing to do with the heating up of the Karl Rove scandal and the desperate desire to knock it off the front page.
The sides are already polarized. Leftist organizations have raised about 5 million dollars from the filibuster crisis to fight a contentious Supreme Court nomination. Right-wing organizations have between $10-20 million. We have to fight this one with the strength of numbers and voices, because money just won't cut it. This one counts; this one matters.
Let's all do what we can. It's the patriotic thing to do. This is about justice, morality, and protecting the last of the progress the people have made to create a government in their own image. Of the people, by the people, for the people. Remember? Let's make sure our government does.
MoveOn.org has a petition ready and waiting. Here's my sample letter:
TO: (My senators)
FROM: (My Name and Email)
SUBJECT: Oppose John Roberts
__________
Dear Senator,
Being smart does not exempt a Supreme Court Justice from being honorable and standing up for the freedoms the people have fought so hard for in this country, including the right of ordinary people and workers to stand up to corporate interests for profit and the right of every woman to choose whether to use her body to bring life into the world.
Judge Roberts may be smart, qualified, and dignified, but he does NOT represent the pragmatic, moderate, and deliberative model of Supreme Court Justice that Sandra Day O'Connor embodied and whose balance is sorely lacking on the remaining Court.
He is NOT the right choice for the Court that plays such a crucial check and balance as one arm of a three-part government envisioned by the creators of the freest and fairest of nations.
The American people deserve a Justice who will help to ensure that the people have recourse in the nation's highest court to be heard fairly on issues where corporations and government officials paid off by them do not have the public's interest at heart.
That's why I'm writing you to ask that you oppose Judge John Roberts' nomination. We can't afford to have a right-wing ideologue on our nation's highest court.
Sincerely,
My name, My Address
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Lest we forget
Maggie says:
According to BBC News, nearly 25,000 Iraqi civilians have died violently in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003. According to the report cited, our country is responsible for more than a third of those deaths.
Think about that. Twenty - Five - THOUSAND Iraqi civilians dead because we invaded their country. I'm so ashamed.
Things Heat Up for Karl Rove (who fans the flames trying to keep it cool)
Caption from Austin American-Statesman:
Bush adviser Karl Rove, at a ceremony for the Indian prime minister Monday, was a source for a Time magazine story about a CIA operative.
Mikaela says:
Today's White House Briefing by Dan Froomkin of the Washington Post does a brilliant job parsing out the Bush Administration response to this snowballing story:
Look Over There!
The stonewall's not working so well. Neither is the legalistic parsing. The furor over who leaked a CIA operative's name shows no sign of abating.
Two options present themselves to the White House: Go public with all the facts -- or try to change the subject.
Signs are pointing toward the latter.
Today's news includes:
· A new poll showing that the public is increasingly skeptical that the White House is cooperating with the federal investigation into who leaked Valerie Plame's identity, and wants Karl Rove fired if it turns out to be him.
· A shifting stance by President Bush over what he considers a firing offense -- one that clashes with his vow to bring back high ethical standards to the White House.
· A new report that the classified State Department memo that may have played a role in the leak made clear that information identifying Plame was sensitive and shouldn't be shared.
· Word that President Bush is expediting his announcement of a Supreme Court nominee to deflect attention from the leak story.
It's worthwhile to read the transcript from yesterday's press briefing with the ever elusive Scott McLellan. The best exchange comes from a question by Helen Thomas after repeated efforts on Scottie's part to say that the administration doesn't have all the facts:
Q: "What is his [Bush's] problem? Two years, and he can't call Rove in and find out what the hell is going on? I mean, why is it so difficult to find out the facts? It costs thousands, millions of dollars, two years, it tied up how many lawyers? All he's got to do is call him in."
MR. McCLELLAN: You just heard from the President. He said he doesn't know all the facts. I don't know all the facts.
Q Why?
MR. McCLELLAN: We want to know what the facts are. Because --
Q Why doesn't he ask him?
MR. McCLELLAN: I'll tell you why, because there's an investigation that is continuing at this point, and the appropriate people to handle these issues are the ones who are overseeing that investigation. There is a special prosecutor that has been appointed. And it's important that we let all the facts come out. And then at that point, we'll be glad to talk about it, but we shouldn't be getting into --
Q You talked about it to reporters.
MR. McCLELLAN: We shouldn't be getting into prejudging the outcome.
And then, shockingly, Scott calls on someone else. You go, girl!
